Reeves Scott, Palaganas Janice, Zierler Brenda
Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Kingston University & St. George's, University of London; St. George's Hospital, Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0BE, UK. Tel +44(0)208 7252278. s.reeves@ sgul.kingston.ac.uk.
J Allied Health. 2017 Spring;46(1):56-61.
With continued growth and investment in interprofessional education (IPE) activities, there is a persistent need to understand the effect of IPE on learning, organizations, systems, and patients. This paper presents an update of a previously published synthesis of reviews. In doing so, it provides a critical appraisal of the most recent evidence for the IPE review literature. Following a search of the literature, eight IPE reviews were identified. Findings from this synthesis indicate continued methodological weaknesses, similarities in the methodological approaches to the reviews, and a focus on short-term impact with a lack of attention on long-term impact. Despite methodological problems, the synthesis provides some insight to an increasing quality of research designs in IPE reviews. This paper discusses synthesized findings in relation to current IPE literature and in comparison with the previously published findings and offers suggestions for future directions.
随着跨专业教育（IPE）活动的持续发展和投入，一直存在了解IPE对学习、组织、系统和患者影响的需求。本文介绍了之前发表的综述综合报告的更新情况。在此过程中，它对IPE综述文献的最新证据进行了批判性评估。在检索文献后，确定了八项IPE综述。该综合报告的结果表明，方法学上仍存在弱点，综述的方法学方法存在相似性，且侧重于短期影响，而对长期影响缺乏关注。尽管存在方法学问题，但该综合报告为IPE综述中研究设计质量的提高提供了一些见解。本文讨论了与当前IPE文献相关的综合结果，并与之前发表的结果进行了比较，还为未来方向提出了建议。
