Suppr超能文献

多感官教学对学习字母名称与发音、单词阅读及拼写的影响。

The impact of multisensory instruction on learning letter names and sounds, word reading, and spelling.

作者信息

Schlesinger Nora W, Gray Shelley

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Education, Kennesaw State University, 585 Cobb Avenue NW, MD 0121, Kennesaw, GA, 30144-5591, USA.

出版信息

Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Oct;67(3):219-258. doi: 10.1007/s11881-017-0140-z. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the use of simultaneous multisensory structured language instruction promoted better letter name and sound production, word reading, and word spelling for second grade children with typical development (N = 6) or with dyslexia (N = 5) than structured language instruction alone. The use of non-English graphemes (letters) to represent two pretend languages was used to control for children's lexical knowledge. A multiple baseline, multiple probe across subjects single-case design, with an embedded alternating treatments design, was used to compare the efficacy of multisensory and structured language interventions. Both interventions provided explicit systematic phonics instruction; however, the multisensory intervention also utilized simultaneous engagement of at least two sensory modalities (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic/tactile). Participant's graphed data was visually analyzed, and individual Tau-U and weighted Tau-U effect sizes were calculated for the outcome variables of letter name production, letter sound production, word reading, and word spelling. The multisensory intervention did not provide an advantage over the structured intervention for participants with typical development or dyslexia. However, both interventions had an overall treatment effect for participants with typical development and dyslexia, although intervention effects varied by outcome variable.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查,对于发育正常的二年级儿童(N = 6)或患有诵读困难的儿童(N = 5),与单独的结构化语言教学相比,同时使用多感官结构化语言教学是否能促进更好的字母名称和发音、单词阅读及单词拼写。使用非英语字母来代表两种虚构语言,以控制儿童的词汇知识。采用多基线、跨被试多探针单案例设计,并嵌入交替治疗设计,来比较多感官和结构化语言干预的效果。两种干预都提供明确、系统的自然拼读教学;然而,多感官干预还同时利用了至少两种感官模式(视觉、听觉和动觉/触觉)。对参与者的图表数据进行了视觉分析,并针对字母名称产出、字母发音产出、单词阅读和单词拼写的结果变量计算了个体Tau-U和加权Tau-U效应量。对于发育正常或患有诵读困难的参与者,多感官干预并未比结构化干预具有优势。然而,两种干预对发育正常和患有诵读困难的参与者都有总体治疗效果,尽管干预效果因结果变量而异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验