Schwammenthal Yvonne, Tsabari Rakefet, Orion David, Merzlyak Oleg, Haratz Salo, Peretz Shlomi, Bornstein Natan M, Ifergane Gal, Einhorn Michal, Schwammenthal Ehud, Geva Diklah, Tanne David
From the Department of Neurology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel (Y.S., R.T., D.O., O.M., S.H., S.P., D.T.); Department of Neurology, Elias Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel (N.M.B.); Department of Neurology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel (G.I.); Israeli Association for Cardiovascular Trials, Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel (M.E., D.G.); and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel (Y.S., R.T., D.O., O.M., S.H., S.P., N.M.B., G.I., E.S., D.T.).
Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):1092-1094. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015776. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
Despite overwhelming evidence for the benefits of anticoagulation in patients with brain ischemia and atrial fibrillation, vast underuse has been reported.
Use of anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention was assessed in the National Acute Stroke Israeli Survey registry (NASIS) of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation and acute brain ischemia. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of clinical covariates on anticoagulation therapy at discharge, and anticoagulation use over time was assessed in subgroups of patients with identified barriers to anticoagulation utilization.
There were 1254 survivors of acute brain ischemia with atrial fibrillation (mean age 77.2±10.6 years; 57.7% female). Between 2004 and 2013, the proportion of patients discharged on anticoagulation increased from 55% to 76.2%, and among those without perceived contraindications from 70% to 96% (<0.0001). Older age, greater stroke severity, earlier registry period, and presence of contraindications were independent predictors of withholding therapy. Increased anticoagulation use over the years was observed even in patients with barriers to anticoagulation use, including patients with potential contraindications (<0.001).
In survivors of acute brain ischemia with atrial fibrillation, we observed a substantial increase in anticoagulation utilization within less than a decade. This change was mainly driven by greater utilization of anticoagulation in subgroups with traditional clinical barriers to anticoagulation use, indicating a shift in physicians' perceptions of the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation.
尽管有大量证据表明抗凝治疗对脑缺血合并心房颤动患者有益,但据报道其使用率仍极低。
在以色列全国急性卒中调查登记处(NASIS)中,对住院的心房颤动合并急性脑缺血患者使用抗凝药物进行二级预防的情况进行评估。采用逻辑回归分析来评估临床协变量对出院时抗凝治疗的影响,并在确定存在抗凝药物使用障碍的患者亚组中评估随时间推移的抗凝药物使用情况。
有1254名急性脑缺血合并心房颤动的幸存者(平均年龄77.2±10.6岁;女性占57.7%)。2004年至2013年间,出院时接受抗凝治疗的患者比例从55%增至76.2%,在无明显禁忌证的患者中,这一比例从70%增至96%(<0.0001)。年龄较大、卒中严重程度较高、登记时间较早以及存在禁忌证是不进行治疗的独立预测因素。即使在存在抗凝药物使用障碍的患者中,包括有潜在禁忌证的患者,多年来抗凝药物的使用也有所增加(<0.001)。
在急性脑缺血合并心房颤动的幸存者中,我们观察到在不到十年的时间里抗凝药物的使用率大幅上升。这一变化主要是由在存在传统临床抗凝药物使用障碍的亚组中抗凝药物使用的增加所驱动的,这表明医生对抗凝治疗风险效益比的认识发生了转变。