• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五年级关系建立干预的效果。

The efficacy of a relationship building intervention in 5th grade.

机构信息

Arizona State University, P.O. Box 853701, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States.

University of Richmond, 28 Westhampton Way, Richmond, VA 23173, United States.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2017 Apr;61:75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.01.002
PMID:28259245
Abstract

The present study reports initial efficacy data for a new school-based intervention - the Relationship Building Intervention (RBI) - that includes a series of teacher-facilitated, structured activities designed to promote positive peer relationships and inclusive classroom communities. The RBI was evaluated in fifth-grade classrooms by estimating multilevel model (MLM) analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) comparing 368 fifth-grade students in intervention classrooms with 259 fifth-graders in control classrooms on social behaviors, perceptions of classroom connectedness, and academic performance. Controlling for pretest scores, cohort, and demographic variables, findings revealed that students who participated in the RBI liked school more, felt a greater sense of classroom identification and inclusion, were perceived by teachers to be less aggressive, and performed better academically than students who were in control classrooms. Further, implementation data showed that students and teachers responded positively to the activities. These results suggest that the RBI is a promising approach for improving the social and learning environment in fifth-grade classrooms.

摘要

本研究报告了一项新的基于学校的干预措施——关系建立干预(RBI)的初步效果数据,该干预措施包括一系列教师主导的、结构化的活动,旨在促进积极的同伴关系和包容的课堂社区。通过对干预班的 368 名五年级学生和对照班的 259 名五年级学生进行多层次模型(MLM)分析协方差(ANCOVA)的估计,评估了 RBI 在五年级课堂上的效果。在控制前测分数、队列和人口统计学变量的情况下,研究结果表明,参与 RBI 的学生比对照组的学生更喜欢学校,对课堂的认同感和包容性更强,被老师认为攻击性更小,学习成绩也更好。此外,实施数据显示,学生和教师对这些活动反应积极。这些结果表明,RBI 是改善五年级课堂社会和学习环境的一种有前途的方法。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of a relationship building intervention in 5th grade.五年级关系建立干预的效果。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Apr;61:75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
2
The social status of aggressive students across contexts: the role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade.不同情境下攻击型学生的社会地位:课堂地位等级、学业成绩和年级的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1699-710. doi: 10.1037/a0025271. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
3
Peer Influence on Academic Performance: A Social Network Analysis of Social-Emotional Intervention Effects.同伴对学业成绩的影响:社会情感干预效果的社会网络分析
Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):903-913. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0678-8.
4
Mapping the Social World of Classrooms: A Multi-Level, Multi-Reporter Approach to Social Processes and Behavioral Engagement.描绘课堂的社会世界:一种针对社会过程和行为参与度的多层次、多报告者方法
Am J Community Psychol. 2016 Mar;57(1-2):20-35. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12022. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
5
A description of classroom help networks, individual network position, and their associations with academic achievement.课堂帮助网络的描述、个体网络位置及其与学业成绩的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0208173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208173. eCollection 2018.
6
Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: a social relations analysis.同伴地位与课堂座位安排:一项社会关系分析。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
7
Teacher practices as predictors of children's classroom social preference.教师实践是儿童课堂社会偏好的预测因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
8
How do collective student behavior and other classroom contextual factors relate to teachers' implementation of an evidence-based intervention? A multilevel structural equation model.集体学生行为和其他课堂背景因素如何与教师实施基于证据的干预措施相关?多层次结构方程模型。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1827-1835. doi: 10.1017/S095457941900097X.
9
Classroom risks and resources: Teacher burnout, classroom quality and children's adjustment in high needs elementary schools.课堂风险与资源:高需求小学教师职业倦怠、课堂质量与儿童适应情况
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Oct;53(5):337-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Promoting Peer Connectedness Through Social-Emotional Learning: Evaluating the Intervention Effect Mechanisms and Implementation Factors of a Social-Emotional Learning Programme for 9 to 12-Year-Olds.通过社会情感学习促进同伴关系:评估一项针对 9 至 12 岁儿童的社会情感学习计划的干预效果机制和实施因素。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jan;53(1):89-116. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01871-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of School Connectedness Interventions for Adolescents.青少年学校联结干预的范围综述
J Sch Health. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1111/josh.70036.
2
Longitudinal and Reciprocal Effects in the Association Between School Bullying and Homicidal Ideation During Early Adolescence.青少年早期学校欺凌与杀人意念之间的纵向和互惠关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Sep;53(9):1971-1986. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02001-x. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Social Anxiety and Peer Victimization and Aggression: Examining Reciprocal Trait-State Effects among Early Adolescents.
社交焦虑与同伴侵害和攻击:考察青少年早期的特质-状态互惠效应。
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Mar;53(3):701-717. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01920-5. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
Assessing the benefits of the "Intergalactic World" social emotional learning program for 8-12-year-old children in Portugal: perspectives from teachers and caregivers.评估“星际世界”社会情感学习项目对葡萄牙8至12岁儿童的益处:来自教师和照顾者的观点。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1233335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233335. eCollection 2023.
5
A Social Emotional Learning Training Programme in a Poor Rural Primary School in Central China: A Pre-Post Intervention Study.中国中部贫困农村小学的社会情感学习培训项目:一项干预前后研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 21;10(11):2332. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112332.
6
Does It Matter If Students (Dis)like School? Associations Between School Liking, Teacher and School Connectedness, and Exclusionary Discipline.学生是否喜欢学校重要吗?学校喜爱度、师生关系与学校归属感以及排斥性纪律之间的关联
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 3;13:825036. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825036. eCollection 2022.
7
Positive University Environment and Agreeableness as Protective Factors Against Antisocial Behavior in Mexican University Students.积极的大学环境和宜人性作为墨西哥大学生反社会行为的保护因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 22;12:662146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662146. eCollection 2021.
8
Dyadic Peer Interactions: the Impact of Aggression on Impression Formation with New Peers.对偶同伴互动:攻击行为对与新同伴形成印象的影响。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 May;47(5):839-850. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0490-y.
9
Classroom identification in ethnic minority and majority students: Effects of relationships and ethnic composition.少数民族和多数民族学生的课堂认同:关系和民族构成的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Dec;89(4):707-725. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12253. Epub 2018 Oct 26.