Cummine Jacqueline, Hanif Wahab, Dymouriak-Tymashov Inna, Anchuri Kavya, Chiu Stephanie, Boliek Carol A
Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-70 8205 114st, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G4, Canada.
Brain Topogr. 2017 Sep;30(5):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s10548-017-0553-3. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
A differentiation in function between the pre-SMA (i.e., cognitive load) and the SMA-proper (i.e., motor execution) has been described (Zhang et al., Cereb Cortex 22:99-111, 2012). These differential SMA functions may be influential in overt reading tasks. The present study examined the relationships between various segments of the SMA and overt reading through the modulation of task demands in an effort to explore the complexity of the print-to-speech network. Skilled reading adults (N = 15) took part in five overt reading tasks: pure regular word reading, pure exception word reading, mixed regular word and exception word reading, go/no-go reading with nonword foils and go/no-go reading with pseudohomophone foils. Five regions of interest that spanned the pre-SMA to the SMA-proper were isolated. Behaviour-function relationships were tested to examine the associations between performance (response time) and brain activity (percent signal change). Further, the coherence between feedforward (SMA) and feedback (supramarginal gyrus) regions were explored to further refine the print-to-speech network. We found that the pre-SMA was related to cognitively demanding tasks (go/no-go with pseudohomophones), whereas the SMA-proper was related to an automatized task (pure regular words). Notably, only those tasks that required information from the feedback system (i.e., mixed word lists, go/no-go tasks) showed connections between SMA regions and the supramarginal gyrus, which is in line with the role of feedback and feedforward systems in the print-to-speech network. Together, these results support the notion that the pre-SMA and SMA-proper are sensitive to reading tasks that differentially invoke higher cognitive resources (mixed word lists, go/no-go) versus automatized articulation (pure lists), respectively. We discuss our findings in the context of print-to-speech neural networks.
前人已描述过前辅助运动区(即认知负荷)和真正的辅助运动区(即运动执行)之间的功能差异(Zhang等人,《大脑皮层》22:99 - 111,2012年)。这些不同的辅助运动区功能可能会影响公开阅读任务。本研究通过调节任务需求,考察了辅助运动区各部分与公开阅读之间的关系,以探索从印刷文字到语音网络的复杂性。熟练阅读的成年人(N = 15)参与了五项公开阅读任务:纯规则单词阅读、纯例外单词阅读、规则单词与例外单词混合阅读、含非单词干扰项的“是/否”阅读以及含假同音字干扰项的“是/否”阅读。分离出了从前辅助运动区到真正的辅助运动区的五个感兴趣区域。测试了行为与功能的关系,以检验表现(反应时间)与大脑活动(信号变化百分比)之间的关联。此外,还探究了前馈(辅助运动区)和反馈(缘上回)区域之间的连贯性,以进一步完善从印刷文字到语音的网络。我们发现,前辅助运动区与认知要求高的任务(含假同音字的“是/否”阅读)有关,而真正的辅助运动区与自动化任务(纯规则单词)有关。值得注意的是,只有那些需要来自反馈系统信息的任务(即混合单词列表、“是/否”任务)显示出辅助运动区区域与缘上回之间的联系,这与反馈和前馈系统在从印刷文字到语音网络中的作用相符。总之,这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即前辅助运动区和真正的辅助运动区分别对不同地调用更高认知资源(混合单词列表、“是/否”阅读)与自动化发音(纯列表)的阅读任务敏感。我们将在从印刷文字到语音神经网络的背景下讨论我们的发现。