Sadeghi Afsaneh, Khaleghnejad Tabari Ahmad, Mahdavi Alireza, Salarian Sara, Razavi Seyed Sajjad
Department of Anesthesiology, Pediatric Surgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Feb 20;12:3237-3241. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S119208. eCollection 2017.
Anesthesia induction is a stressful event for children and their parents, and may have potentially harmful consequences on the patient's physiological and mental situation. Stressful anesthesia induction has psychological adverse effects that recur with repeated anesthesia, can lead to increased pediatric discomfort during the recovery period, and may even induce reactionary postoperative behavior. A randomized controlled trial was performed to assess the impact of parental presence during induction of anesthesia (PPIA) on preoperative anxiety of pediatric patients and their parents at three different times, cooperation of child with anesthesiologist at induction of anesthesia, and parental satisfaction.
A total of 96 pediatric patients undergoing elective minor surgery (ASA 1-2) were randomly divided into two groups. Both groups received oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) at least 20 minutes before surgery, but in the PPIA group, the parents were also present in the operating room until loss of consciousness of child at anesthesia induction. Anxiety in the patients (as measured by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale [mYPAS]) and parents (as measured by the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC), and parental satisfaction (as measured by visual analog scale) were assessed.
There was no significant difference in the mean anxiety scores (mYPAS) of participants in the control and PPIA groups at ward T0 and upon arrival to operating room T1 (>0.05). However, between the PPIA and control groups, mean mYPAS score was different at the time of induction of anesthesia T2 (35.5±16.6 vs 59.8±22.4; <0.001). The ICC scores showed that perfect score was significantly different in the PPIA and control groups (66.6% vs 6.3%; <0.01). The STAI scores of the parents in the two groups did not differ in T0, T1, and T2. The mean parental satisfaction score was higher in the PPIA group than in the control group (7.6±7.0 vs 5.8±6.1; <0.01).
PPIA may reduce preoperative state anxiety of pediatric patients and improve quality of anesthesia induction based on ICC scores and higher parental satisfaction, but it does not impact on parental state anxiety.
麻醉诱导对儿童及其父母来说是一个压力事件,可能对患者的生理和心理状况产生潜在的有害后果。有压力的麻醉诱导具有心理不良影响,会在反复麻醉时再次出现,可导致儿童在恢复期不适增加,甚至可能诱发术后反动行为。进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估麻醉诱导期间父母陪伴(PPIA)在三个不同时间点对儿科患者及其父母术前焦虑、儿童在麻醉诱导时与麻醉医生的配合情况以及父母满意度的影响。
总共96例接受择期小手术(ASA 1 - 2级)的儿科患者被随机分为两组。两组均在手术前至少20分钟口服咪达唑仑(0.5毫克/千克),但在PPIA组中,父母也会在手术室陪伴直至儿童在麻醉诱导时失去意识。评估患者(通过改良耶鲁术前焦虑量表[mYPAS]测量)和父母(通过状态 - 特质焦虑量表[STAI]测量)的焦虑、诱导依从性检查表(ICC)以及父母满意度(通过视觉模拟量表测量)。
在病房T0和到达手术室T1时,对照组和PPIA组参与者的平均焦虑评分(mYPAS)无显著差异(>0.05)。然而,在PPIA组和对照组之间,麻醉诱导时T2的平均mYPAS评分不同(35.5±16.6对59.8±22.4;<0.001)。ICC评分显示,PPIA组和对照组的满分率有显著差异(66.6%对6.3%;<0.01)。两组父母的STAI评分在T0、T1和T2时无差异。PPIA组的父母平均满意度评分高于对照组(7.6±7.0对5.8±6.1;<0.01)。
基于ICC评分和更高的父母满意度,PPIA可能会降低儿科患者的术前状态焦虑并改善麻醉诱导质量,但它对父母的状态焦虑没有影响。