Suppr超能文献

口服咪达唑仑与鼻内给予右美托咪定对接受手术的儿童术前镇静及麻醉诱导效果的比较

Comparison of the Effects of Oral Midazolam and Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Preoperative Sedation and Anesthesia Induction in Children Undergoing Surgeries.

作者信息

Cai Yu-Hang, Wang Cheng-Yu, Li Yang, Chen Jia, Li Jun, Wu Junzheng, Liu Hua-Cheng

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Zhejiang Province, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 15;12:648699. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.648699. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Premedication with either oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine prior to surgery remains less than ideal. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of those two drug regimens would have any beneficial effects on the preoperative sedation and the children's compliance during anesthesia inhalation induction. One hundred thirty-eight children aged 2-6 years were randomly allocated into three groups: Group M with oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg, Group D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg kg, and Group M + D with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg. The primary outcome was the children's compliance during inhalation induction with sevoflurane. The secondary outcomes included the preoperative sedative effects, behavior scores, parental separation anxiety scores, and the postoperative incidence of emergence agitation and recovery time. Subjects in Group M + D showed higher satisfaction scores of compliance ( = 0.0049) and mask acceptance (MAS) ( = 0.0049) during anesthesia inhalation induction. Subjects in Group M + D had a significantly shorter time than those in Groups M and D to achieve the desired sedation level ( < 0.001) and remained at a higher sedation score in the holding area and up to the anesthesia induction after drug administration ( < 0.001). We conclude that pediatric patients premedicated with intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg kg plus oral midazolam 0.5 mg kg had significantly improved anesthesia induction compliance, and quicker onset to achieve and maintain a satisfactory level of sedation than those premedicated separately with two drugs. Therefore, the combined premed regimen is a greater choice when we are expecting a higher quality of sedation and a smoother anesthesia induction in children undergoing the surgeries.

摘要

术前使用口服咪达唑仑或鼻内右美托咪定进行预处理仍不尽人意。本研究的目的是调查这两种药物方案的联合使用是否会对术前镇静及麻醉吸入诱导期间儿童的配合度产生有益影响。138名2至6岁的儿童被随机分为三组:M组口服咪达唑仑0.5mg/kg,D组鼻内给予右美托咪定2μg/kg,M+D组鼻内给予右美托咪定1μg/kg加口服咪达唑仑0.5mg/kg。主要结局是儿童在七氟醚吸入诱导期间的配合度。次要结局包括术前镇静效果、行为评分、家长分离焦虑评分以及术后苏醒期躁动的发生率和恢复时间。M+D组受试者在麻醉吸入诱导期间的配合度满意度评分(P=0.0049)和面罩接受度(MAS)评分(P=0.0049)更高。M+D组受试者达到所需镇静水平的时间明显短于M组和D组(P<0.001),并且在等待区直至给药后的麻醉诱导期间保持较高的镇静评分(P<0.001)。我们得出结论,与单独使用两种药物进行预处理的患儿相比,鼻内给予1μg/kg右美托咪定加口服0.5mg/kg咪达唑仑进行预处理的儿科患者在麻醉诱导时的配合度显著提高,且达到并维持满意镇静水平的起效更快。因此,当我们期望为接受手术的儿童提供更高质量的镇静和更平稳的麻醉诱导时,联合预处理方案是更好的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2494/8714926/fc1238e4049c/fphar-12-648699-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验