Schmidt Robert L, Mock Donald M, Franco Robert S, Cohen Robert M, North Anne K, Cancelas José A, Geisen Christof, Strauss Ronald G, Vlaar Alexander P, Nalbant Demet, Widness John A
Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1488-1496. doi: 10.1111/trf.14075. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
Biotin-labeled red blood cells (BioRBCs) are used for in vivo kinetic studies. Because BioRBC dosing occasionally induces antibodies, a sensitive and specific anti-BioRBC detection assay is needed.
Aims were to 1) develop a gel card assay to evaluate existing, naturally occurring and BioRBC-induced plasma antibodies, 2) compare gel card and tube agglutination detection results, and 3) test for a relationship of antibody induction and BioRBC dose. Reagent BioRBCs were prepared using sulfo-NHS biotin ranging from densities 18 (BioRBC-18) to 1458 (BioRBC-1458) µg/mL RBCs.
Among BioRBC-exposed subjects, gel card and tube agglutination results were concordant in 21 of 22 adults and all 19 infant plasma samples. Gel card antibody detection sensitivity was more than 10-fold greater than tube agglutination. Twelve to 16 weeks after BioRBC exposure, induced anti-antibodies were detected by gel card in three of 26 adults (12%) at reagent densities BioRBC-256 or less, but in none of 41 infants. Importantly, induced anti-BioRBC antibodies were associated with higher BioRBC dose (p = 0.008); no antibodies were detected in 18 subjects who received BioRBC doses less than or equal to BioRBC-18. For noninduced BioRBC antibodies, six of 1125 naïve adults (0.3%) and none of 46 naïve infants demonstrated existing anti-BioRBC antibodies using reagent BioRBC-140 or -162. Existing anti-BioRBCs were all neutralized by biotin compounds, while induced antibodies were not.
The gel card assay is more sensitive than the tube agglutination assay. We recommend reagent BioRBC-256 for identifying anti-BioRBCs. Use of a low total RBC biotin label dose (≤ BioRBC-18) may minimize antibody induction.
生物素标记的红细胞(BioRBCs)用于体内动力学研究。由于BioRBC给药偶尔会诱导抗体产生,因此需要一种灵敏且特异的抗BioRBC检测方法。
目的是:1)开发一种凝胶卡检测法,以评估现有的、天然存在的以及BioRBC诱导产生的血浆抗体;2)比较凝胶卡和试管凝集检测结果;3)检测抗体诱导与BioRBC剂量之间的关系。使用密度范围为18(BioRBC - 18)至1458(BioRBC - 1458)μg/mL红细胞的磺基 - NHS生物素制备试剂BioRBCs。
在接触BioRBC的受试者中,22名成年人中的21名以及所有19份婴儿血浆样本的凝胶卡和试管凝集结果一致。凝胶卡抗体检测灵敏度比试管凝集高10倍以上。BioRBC接触后12至16周,在26名成年人中有3名(12%)通过凝胶卡在BioRBC试剂密度为BioRBC - 256或更低时检测到诱导产生的抗抗体,但在41名婴儿中均未检测到。重要的是,诱导产生的抗BioRBC抗体与更高的BioRBC剂量相关(p = 0.008);在接受BioRBC剂量小于或等于BioRBC - 18的18名受试者中未检测到抗体。对于未诱导产生的BioRBC抗体,1125名未接触过的成年人中有6名(0.3%),46名未接触过的婴儿中无一例使用试剂BioRBC - 140或 - 162检测到现有的抗BioRBC抗体。现有的抗BioRBCs均被生物素化合物中和,而诱导产生的抗体则未被中和。
凝胶卡检测法比试管凝集检测法更灵敏。我们推荐使用试剂BioRBC - 256来鉴定抗BioRBCs。使用低总红细胞生物素标记剂量(≤BioRBC - 18)可能会使抗体诱导降至最低。