Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症管理研究中的年龄歧视

Ageism in Studies on the Management of Osteoporosis.

作者信息

McGarvey Caoimhe, Coughlan Tara, O'Neill Desmond

机构信息

Centre for Ageing, Neuroscience and the Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1566-1568. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14840. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature to assess whether the fact that osteoporosis is chiefly considered a disease of the older population was reflected in research in the area of the management of osteoporosis and to determine the extent of ageism in studies on the management of osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Review.

SETTING

All randomized control trials on the management of osteoporosis entered in the Cochrane Library Database that reported mean age were included. Exclusion criteria were also examined. Of 284 randomized control trials identified, 102 were eligible for inclusion.

PARTICIPANTS

Older adult trail participants.

MEASUREMENTS

Mean age of participants and exclusion criteria used were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of all participants was 64.0, despite the fact that the average age at hip fracture is 83 for women and 84 for men. Overall, the mean age of those presenting with hip fractures is 84.8. Twenty-four (23%) of the 102 trials used older age as an exclusion factor. Other exclusion factors were long time since menopause, impaired cardiac or pulmonary function, dependent in ambulation, any severe comorbidity, dementia or any cognitive impairment, recent history of peptic ulcer disease or erosive gastric disease, uncontrolled hypertension, and psychiatric illness.

CONCLUSION

These data show a distinct difference between the mean age of participants in studies of the management of osteoporosis and the mean age of those presenting with hip fractures. Given that osteoporosis is the leading cause of hip fractures, this finding could have a significant effect on future studies in this area. It would follow that future research should include a cohort of an age that is more reflective of those most likely to experience the adverse effects of osteoporosis.

摘要

目的

回顾文献,评估骨质疏松症主要被视为老年人群疾病这一事实是否在骨质疏松症管理领域的研究中有所体现,并确定骨质疏松症管理研究中的年龄歧视程度。

设计

综述。

背景

纳入Cochrane图书馆数据库中所有关于骨质疏松症管理的随机对照试验,这些试验报告了平均年龄。还检查了排除标准。在识别出的284项随机对照试验中,102项符合纳入条件。

参与者

老年试验参与者。

测量

分析参与者的平均年龄和使用的排除标准。

结果

所有参与者的平均年龄为64.0岁,尽管女性髋部骨折的平均年龄为83岁,男性为84岁。总体而言,髋部骨折患者的平均年龄为84.8岁。102项试验中有24项(23%)将高龄作为排除因素。其他排除因素包括绝经时间长、心肺功能受损、行走依赖、任何严重的合并症、痴呆或任何认知障碍、消化性溃疡病或糜烂性胃病的近期病史、未控制的高血压和精神疾病。

结论

这些数据表明,骨质疏松症管理研究中参与者的平均年龄与髋部骨折患者的平均年龄存在明显差异。鉴于骨质疏松症是髋部骨折的主要原因,这一发现可能对该领域未来的研究产生重大影响。因此,未来的研究应纳入一个更能反映最有可能经历骨质疏松症不良影响人群年龄的队列。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验