Rémuzat Cécile, Dorey Julie, Cristeau Olivier, Ionescu Dan, Radière Guerric, Toumi Mondher
Pricing and Market Access Department, Creativ-Ceutical , Paris , France.
HEOR Department, Creativ-Ceutical , Paris , France.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Jan 30;5(1):1272308. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2016.1272308. eCollection 2017.
& : Potential drivers and barriers of biosimilar uptake were mainly analysed through qualitative approaches. The study objective was to conduct a quantitative analysis and identify drivers of biosimilar uptake of all available biosimilars in the European Union (EU). : A three-step process was established to identify key drivers for the uptake of biosimilars in the top 10 EU member states (MS) pharmaceutical markets (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and the UK): (1) literature review to identify incentive policies in place to enhance biosimilars adoption; (2) assessment of biosimilar market dynamics based on database analysis; (3) regression model analysis on price using the following explicative variables: incentive policies; price difference between the biosimilar and the originator product; distribution channel; generic uptake and generic price cut; pharmaceutical expenditure per capita; and market competition. : At the study cut-off date, 20 biosimilars were available on the market. Incentive policies applied to biosimilars were found to be heterogeneous across countries, and uptakes of biosimilars were also very heterogeneous between different therapeutic classes and countries. Results from the model demonstrated that incentive policies and the date of first biosimilar market entry were correlated to biosimilar uptake. Pharmaceutical expenditure per capita and the highest generic uptake were inversely correlated with biosimilar uptake. Average generic price discount over originator and the number of biosimilars showed a trend toward statistical significance for correlation with biosimilar uptake, but did not reach the significance threshold. Biosimilar price discount over original biologic price, the number of analogues, and the distribution channel were not correlated with the biosimilar uptake. : Understanding drivers of biosimilar uptake becomes a critical issue to inform policy decision-makers. This study showed that incentive policies to enhance uptake remain an important driver of biosimilar penetration, while biosimilar price discounts have no impact. Future research is warranted when the biosimilar market gains maturity.
&:生物类似药采用的潜在驱动因素和障碍主要通过定性方法进行分析。本研究的目的是进行定量分析,并确定欧盟(EU)所有可用生物类似药采用的驱动因素。:建立了一个三步流程,以确定欧盟前10大成员国(MS)制药市场(比利时、法国、德国、希腊、匈牙利、意大利、波兰、西班牙、瑞典和英国)生物类似药采用的关键驱动因素:(1)文献综述,以确定促进生物类似药采用的激励政策;(2)基于数据库分析评估生物类似药市场动态;(3)使用以下解释变量对价格进行回归模型分析:激励政策;生物类似药与原研产品之间的价格差异;分销渠道;仿制药采用情况和仿制药降价;人均药品支出;以及市场竞争。:在研究截止日期,市场上有20种生物类似药。发现各国适用于生物类似药的激励政策存在差异,不同治疗类别和国家之间生物类似药的采用情况也非常不同。模型结果表明,激励政策和首个生物类似药进入市场的日期与生物类似药的采用相关。人均药品支出和最高仿制药采用率与生物类似药采用率呈负相关。仿制药相对于原研药的平均价格折扣和生物类似药的数量显示出与生物类似药采用率相关的统计显著性趋势,但未达到显著性阈值。生物类似药相对于原研生物药的价格折扣、类似物数量和分销渠道与生物类似药采用率无关。:了解生物类似药采用的驱动因素成为为政策决策者提供信息的关键问题。本研究表明,促进采用生物类似药的激励政策仍然是生物类似药渗透的重要驱动因素,而生物类似药价格折扣没有影响。当生物类似药市场成熟时,有必要进行未来研究。