Veszelei Ivar, Godman Brian, Aaltonen Katri, Selke Gisbert W, Garuolienė Kristina, Cangini Agnese, Kurdi Amanj, Rodrigues António Teixeira, Pontes Caridad, Torre Carla, Lunghi Carlotta, Burton Edel, Poplavska Elita, Jónsdóttir Freyja, Petrova Guenka, Langner Irene, Iaru Irina, Odnoletkova Irina, Slabý Juraj, Gvozdanović Katarina, Saastamoinen Leena, Laius Ott, Benkö Ria, Žiogaitė Silvija, McTaggart Stuart, Mueller Tanja, de Pando Thais, Tesař Tomáš, Mitkova Zornitsa, Wettermark Björn
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
BioDrugs. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s40259-025-00732-2.
Biopharmaceuticals add value in the treatment of many diseases but different health systems in Europe face clinical and economic challenges with introducing them. Joint efforts across Europe are therefore essential to ensure their sustainable and equitable use. However, to date few cross-national comparative studies have assessed their introduction. This study aimed to assess the availability of health authority data and variation in the early diffusion of biopharmaceuticals across Europe.
A cross-sectional study was undertaken to analyze the diffusion of 17 biopharmaceuticals, approved between 2015 and 2019, among European countries between 2015 and 2022. The study assessed data availability, diffusion rates measured as accumulated defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants, as well as relative rankings between countries during the first 4 years following market authorization.
Twenty countries and two regions out of 31 European countries provided data on biopharmaceutical utilization for out-of-hospital care, 15 provided wholesaler data, and 14 provided hospital data. Certain countries and regions contributed data in multiple categories, while six did not provide any data. Diffusion rates were assessed for 17 countries and two regions, which showed appreciable variation, with secukinumab and erenumab being introduced in most countries and follitropin delta and tildrakizumab in the least number of countries. Germany, Austria, and Norway demonstrated the highest early diffusion rates, while Lithuania, Romania, and Latvia had the lowest.
This study revealed a substantial variation between European countries and regions in the early diffusion of biopharmaceuticals and the availability of data to monitor their use. The reasons behind these patterns require further investigation to support European countries in optimizing the use of biopharmaceuticals to reach an equitable and cost-effective use of medicines across Europe.
生物制药在多种疾病的治疗中具有重要价值,但欧洲不同的卫生系统在引入生物制药时面临临床和经济挑战。因此,欧洲各国共同努力对于确保其可持续和公平使用至关重要。然而,迄今为止,很少有跨国比较研究评估生物制药的引入情况。本研究旨在评估欧洲各国卫生当局数据的可获得性以及生物制药早期传播的差异。
开展了一项横断面研究,以分析2015年至2019年间获批的17种生物制药在2015年至2022年间在欧洲各国的传播情况。该研究评估了数据的可获得性、以每1000居民累计限定日剂量衡量的传播率,以及市场授权后前4年各国之间的相对排名。
31个欧洲国家中的20个国家和2个地区提供了院外护理生物制药使用数据,15个国家提供了批发商数据,14个国家提供了医院数据。某些国家和地区提供了多个类别的数据,而6个国家未提供任何数据。对17个国家和2个地区的传播率进行了评估,结果显示存在显著差异,司库奇尤单抗和依瑞奈尤单抗在大多数国家被引入,而曲普瑞林δ和替拉珠单抗在最少的国家被引入。德国、奥地利和挪威的早期传播率最高,而立陶宛、罗马尼亚和拉脱维亚的传播率最低。
本研究揭示了欧洲国家和地区在生物制药早期传播以及监测其使用的数据可获得性方面存在很大差异。这些模式背后的原因需要进一步调查,以支持欧洲各国优化生物制药的使用,从而在整个欧洲实现药品的公平和成本效益使用。