• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你无法同时说话和倾听:一种轮流发言的概率模型。

You cannot speak and listen at the same time: a probabilistic model of turn-taking.

作者信息

Donnarumma Francesco, Dindo Haris, Iodice Pierpaolo, Pezzulo Giovanni

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Via San Martino della Battaglia 44, 00185, Rome, Italy.

RoboticsLab, Polytechnic School (DICGIM), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 6, 90128, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Biol Cybern. 2017 Apr;111(2):165-183. doi: 10.1007/s00422-017-0714-1. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00422-017-0714-1
PMID:28265753
Abstract

Turn-taking is a preverbal skill whose mastering constitutes an important precondition for many social interactions and joint actions. However, the cognitive mechanisms supporting turn-taking abilities are still poorly understood. Here, we propose a computational analysis of turn-taking in terms of two general mechanisms supporting joint actions: action prediction (e.g., recognizing the interlocutor's message and predicting the end of turn) and signaling (e.g., modifying one's own speech to make it more predictable and discriminable). We test the hypothesis that in a simulated conversational scenario dyads using these two mechanisms can recognize the utterances of their co-actors faster, which in turn permits them to give and take turns more efficiently. Furthermore, we discuss how turn-taking dynamics depend on the fact that agents cannot simultaneously use their internal models for both action (or messages) prediction and production, as these have different requirements-or, in other words, they cannot speak and listen at the same time with the same level of accuracy. Our results provide a computational-level characterization of turn-taking in terms of cognitive mechanisms of action prediction and signaling that are shared across various interaction and joint action domains.

摘要

轮流发言是一种语言前技能,其掌握是许多社会互动和联合行动的重要前提条件。然而,支持轮流发言能力的认知机制仍未得到充分理解。在此,我们从支持联合行动的两种一般机制的角度对轮流发言进行了计算分析:行动预测(例如,识别对话者的信息并预测轮次的结束)和信号传递(例如,修改自己的言语使其更具可预测性和可区分性)。我们检验了这样一个假设:在模拟对话场景中,使用这两种机制的二元组能够更快地识别其共同行动者的话语,这反过来又使他们能够更有效地进行轮流发言。此外,我们讨论了轮流发言动态如何取决于这样一个事实,即行动者不能同时将其内部模型用于行动(或信息)预测和生成,因为这两者有不同的要求——或者换句话说,他们不能以相同的准确度同时说话和倾听。我们的结果从行动预测和信号传递的认知机制方面提供了对轮流发言的计算层面的刻画,这些机制在各种互动和联合行动领域中是共有的。

相似文献

1
You cannot speak and listen at the same time: a probabilistic model of turn-taking.你无法同时说话和倾听:一种轮流发言的概率模型。
Biol Cybern. 2017 Apr;111(2):165-183. doi: 10.1007/s00422-017-0714-1. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
Take a breath and take the turn: how breathing meets turns in spontaneous dialogue.深呼吸,迎接转折:呼吸如何在自然对话中应对转折。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Dec 19;369(1658):20130399. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0399.
3
A cognitive architecture for the coordination of utterances.一种用于话语协调的认知架构。
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 1;2:275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00275. eCollection 2011.
4
Listeners are better at predicting speakers similar to themselves.倾听者更善于预测与自己相似的说话者。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103094. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103094. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
5
Overrated gaps: Inter-speaker gaps provide limited information about the timing of turns in conversation.被高估的间隙:说话者之间的间隙提供的关于对话中轮次时间的信息有限。
Cognition. 2022 Jun;223:105037. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105037. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking.双重任务表现的差异揭示了轮流对话中言语规划的延迟启动。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:304-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
7
Predicting One's Turn With Both Body and Mind: Anticipatory Speech Postures During Dyadic Conversation.身心并用预测轮到自己发言:双向对话中的预期言语姿势
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 13;12:684248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684248. eCollection 2021.
8
The role of action prediction and inhibitory control for joint action coordination in toddlers.行动预测和抑制控制在幼儿联合行动协调中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Nov;139:203-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
9
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.
10
Prediction of turn-ends based on anticipation of upcoming words.基于对即将到来的单词的预测来预测转折词。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 1;3:376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376. eCollection 2012.

引用本文的文献

1
(Mis)align: a simple dynamic framework for modeling interpersonal coordination.(误)对齐:一个用于建模人际协调的简单动态框架。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 26;13(1):18325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41516-4.
2
Haptic communication optimises joint decisions and affords implicit confidence sharing.触觉交流优化了联合决策,并提供了隐含的信心共享。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80041-6.
3
The neural oscillatory markers of phonetic convergence during verbal interaction.言语互动中语音趋同的神经振荡标记物。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jan;40(1):187-201. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24364. Epub 2018 Sep 21.