• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一把双刃剑:IV期非小细胞肺癌患者是否应被告知其癌症诊断结果?

A double-edged sword: Should stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients be informed of their cancer diagnosis?

作者信息

Yanwei L, Dongying L, Zhuchen Y, Ling L, Yu Z, Zhanyu P

机构信息

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.

Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12665. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.12665
PMID:28266089
Abstract

This study aimed to examine whether awareness of cancer diagnosis and prognosis among patients with stage IV lung cancer treated with first-line erlotinib vary with psychological distress and quality of life (QoL). This study was carried out at the Comprehensive treatment Department of Tianjin Cancer Hospital between August 2013 and September 2015 among patients ≥18 years-old and suffering from EGFR mutation-positive stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line erlotinib (150 mg/day; N = 137). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was administered before (baseline) and after 12 weeks of treatment. QoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire. Diagnosis and prognosis awareness was assessed by interview. Among patients, 21% reported to be fully aware of their disease; 41% were only aware of the diagnosis, not the stage; and 51% were not aware at all. Among patients, 63.5% reported elevated anxiety, 71.5% were depressed, and 75.2% had HADS score ≥15 (emotional distress). Patients who were totally and partly aware experienced improvements in HADS and FACT-L compared with baseline (all p < .05). Patients who were not aware scored better than the other patients for all FACT-L subscales from baseline to 12 weeks (all p < .05). Aware patients experienced improvements from baseline in HADS and FACT-L (all p < .05). Awareness of cancer diagnosis and stage was associated with initially high global distress and poorer QoL. Unaware patients exhibited better emotional distress and QoL during first-line therapy with erlotinib for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨一线使用厄洛替尼治疗的IV期肺癌患者对癌症诊断和预后的知晓情况是否随心理困扰和生活质量(QoL)而变化。本研究于2013年8月至2015年9月在天津医科大学肿瘤医院综合治疗科开展,研究对象为年龄≥18岁、接受一线厄洛替尼(150mg/天)治疗的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者(N = 137)。在治疗前(基线)和治疗12周后使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)进行评估。使用癌症治疗功能评价量表-肺癌(FACT-L)问卷评估生活质量。通过访谈评估诊断和预后知晓情况。患者中,21%报告完全知晓自己的病情;41%仅知晓诊断,不知晓分期;51%完全不知晓。患者中,63.5%报告焦虑情绪升高,71.5%存在抑郁情绪,75.2%的HADS评分≥15(情绪困扰)。与基线相比,完全知晓和部分知晓的患者在HADS和FACT-L方面有改善(所有p < 0.05)。从基线到12周,不知晓的患者在所有FACT-L子量表上的得分均高于其他患者(所有p < 0.05)。知晓的患者在HADS和FACT-L方面较基线有改善(所有p < 0.05)。癌症诊断和分期的知晓与最初较高的整体困扰和较差的生活质量相关。在EGFR突变阳性的晚期NSCLC患者一线使用厄洛替尼治疗期间,不知晓的患者表现出更好的情绪困扰和生活质量。

相似文献

1
A double-edged sword: Should stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients be informed of their cancer diagnosis?一把双刃剑:IV期非小细胞肺癌患者是否应被告知其癌症诊断结果?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12665. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
2
Effectiveness of erlotinib as a second line therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): our clinical experience.厄洛替尼作为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变患者二线治疗的有效性:我们的临床经验。
Prilozi. 2012;33(1):303-11.
3
Quality of life (QoL) analyses from OPTIMAL (CTONG-0802), a phase III, randomised, open-label study of first-line erlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).来自 OPTIMAL(CTONG-0802)的生活质量(QoL)分析,这是一项 III 期、随机、开放标签的研究,比较了一线厄洛替尼与化疗在晚期 EGFR 突变阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Jun;24(6):1615-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt012. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
4
Comparison of clinical outcomes following gefitinib and erlotinib treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in either exon 19 or 21.比较表皮生长因子受体外显子 19 或 21 突变的非小细胞肺癌患者使用吉非替尼和厄洛替尼治疗的临床结局。
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Apr;9(4):506-11. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000095.
5
Adjuvant Erlotinib Versus Placebo in Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RADIANT): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.厄洛替尼辅助治疗与安慰剂对照用于 IB 期-IIIA 期非小细胞肺癌患者(RADIANT):一项随机、双盲、III 期临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4007-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.8918. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
6
Influence of wellness education on first-line icotinib hydrochloride patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers.健康宣教对一线盐酸埃克替尼治疗的IV期非小细胞肺癌患者及其家庭照顾者的影响
Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 May-Jun;42(3):358-366. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
7
Real-life effectiveness of erlotinib as second-line treatment of stage IIIB/IV squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the PEPiTA observational study.厄洛替尼作为ⅢB/Ⅳ期鳞状非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的真实世界疗效:PEPiTA观察性研究结果
Lung Cancer. 2016 Aug;98:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Clinical impact of switching to a second EGFR-TKI after a severe AE related to a first EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.表皮生长因子受体突变型非小细胞肺癌患者使用第一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)发生严重不良反应后切换使用第二代 EGFR-TKI 的临床影响。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun;42(6):528-33. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys042. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
9
A phase II study of erlotinib monotherapy in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR gene mutation who have never/light smoking history: re-evaluation of EGFR gene status (NEJ006/TCOG0903).厄洛替尼单药治疗既往接受过治疗、无表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变且有从不/轻度吸烟史的非小细胞肺癌的II期研究:EGFR基因状态的重新评估(NEJ006/TCOG0903)
Lung Cancer. 2014 Nov;86(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Randomized phase II study of gefitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who failed previous chemotherapy.一项在既往化疗失败的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中比较吉非替尼和厄洛替尼疗效的随机 II 期临床研究。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Jan;75(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.05.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Awareness in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Narrative Literature Review of the Processes Involved.晚期癌症患者的预后意识:对相关过程的叙述性文献综述
Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Mar 23;15:301-310. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S395259. eCollection 2023.
2
Implementation of the milestones communication approach for patients with limited prognosis: evaluation of intervention fidelity.实施针对预后有限患者的里程碑式沟通方法:干预可信度评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Feb 18;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0527-1.
3
Associations between understanding of current treatment intent, communication with healthcare providers, preferences for invasive life-sustaining interventions and decisional conflict: results from a survey of patients with advanced heart failure in Singapore.
对当前治疗意图的理解、与医疗服务提供者的沟通、对侵入性维持生命干预措施的偏好与决策冲突之间的关联:新加坡晚期心力衰竭患者的调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e021688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021688.