College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43769. doi: 10.1038/srep43769.
Whether there is a general allometry law across plant species with different sizes and under different environment has long been controversial and shrubs are particularly useful to examine these questions. Here we sampled 939 individuals from 50 forest shrub species along a large altitudinal gradient. We tested several allometry models with four relationships simultaneously (between stem diameter, height, leaf, stem and aboveground biomass), including geometric, elastic and stress similarity, and metabolic scaling theory's predictions on small plants (MST) and trees (MST). We also tested if allometric exponents change markedly with climate and phylogeny. The predicted exponents of MST, elastic similarity and stress similarity (models for trees) were not supported by our data, while MST and geometric similarity gained more support, suggesting the finite size effect is more important for shrub allometries than being a woody plant. The influence of climate and phylogeny on allometric exponents were not significant or very weak, again suggesting strong biophysical constraints on shrub allometries. Our results reveal clear differences of shrub allometries from previous findings on trees (e.g. much weaker climatic and phylogenic control). Comparisons of herbs, shrubs and trees along a same climatic gradient are needed for better understanding of plant allometries.
植物物种大小和环境不同,是否存在普遍的生长律一直存在争议,而灌木特别适合用来检验这些问题。在这里,我们沿着一个大的海拔梯度,从 50 种森林灌木物种中抽取了 939 个个体。我们同时测试了四个关系的几种生长律模型(茎直径、高度、叶片、茎和地上生物量之间),包括几何相似性、弹性相似性和压力相似性,以及小植物(MST)和树木(MST)的代谢缩放理论预测。我们还测试了生长律指数是否随着气候和系统发育而显著变化。MST、弹性相似性和压力相似性(树木模型)的预测指数与我们的数据不符,而 MST 和几何相似性得到了更多的支持,这表明有限大小效应对于灌木的生长律比木本植物更为重要。气候和系统发育对生长律指数的影响不显著或很弱,这再次表明灌木生长律受到强烈的生物物理限制。我们的研究结果表明,灌木的生长律与之前关于树木的研究结果有明显的差异(例如,气候和系统发育的控制作用要弱得多)。需要在同一气候梯度上对草本植物、灌木和树木进行比较,以更好地理解植物的生长律。