Suppr超能文献

癌症相关性孤立性远端深静脉血栓形成的长期结局:OPTIMEV 研究。

Long-term outcomes of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: the OPTIMEV study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Investigation Centre, Montpellier University Hospital, EA 2992, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.

Department of Vascular Medicine, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2017 May;15(5):907-916. doi: 10.1111/jth.13664. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Essentials Clinical significance of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) is unknown. We studied patients with iDDVT, with and without cancer, and proximal DVT with cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a much poorer prognosis than iDDVT patients without cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a similar prognosis to cancer-related proximal DVT patients.

SUMMARY

Background Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) (infra-popliteal DVT without pulmonary embolism [PE]) is a frequent event and, in the absence of cancer, is usually considered to be a minor form of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT is unknown. Methods Using data from the observational, prospective multicenter OPTIMEV cohort, we compared, at 3 years, the incidences of death, VTE recurrence and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related iDDVT with those in cancer patients with isolated proximal DVT (matched 1:1 on age and sex) and patients with iDDVT without cancer (matched 1:2 on age and sex). Results As compared with patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT (n = 92), those with cancer-related iDDVT (n = 92) had a similar risk of death (40.8% per patient-year (PY) vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 1.0, 95% CI[0.7-1.4]) and of major bleeding (3.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY, aCHR = 0.9 [0.3-3.2]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.4% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 1.8 [0.7-4.5]). As compared with patients with iDDVT without cancer (n = 184), those with cancer-related iDDVT had a nine times higher risk of death (3.5% per PY vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 9.3 [5.5-15.9]), a higher risk of major bleeding (1.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [0.6-6.1]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.0% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [1.0-3.7]). The results remained similar in the subgroup of patients without history of VTE. Conclusion Patients with cancer-related iDDVT seem to have a prognosis that is similar to that of patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT and a dramatically poorer prognosis than patients with iDDVT without cancer. This underlines the high clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT and the need for additional studies.

摘要

目的

癌症相关孤立性远端深静脉血栓形成(iDDVT)的临床意义尚不清楚。我们研究了有和没有癌症的 iDDVT 患者,以及有癌症的近端深静脉血栓形成(DVT)患者。与无癌症的 iDDVT 患者相比,癌症相关 iDDVT 患者的预后要差得多。与癌症相关的近端 DVT 患者相比,癌症相关 iDDVT 患者的预后相似。

背景

孤立性远端深静脉血栓形成(iDDVT)(无肺栓塞[PE]的 infra-popliteal DVT)是一种常见事件,在没有癌症的情况下,通常被认为是一种轻微的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)。然而,癌症相关 iDDVT 的临床意义尚不清楚。

方法

利用观察性、前瞻性多中心 OPTIMEV 队列的数据,我们比较了 3 年内癌症相关 iDDVT 患者(按年龄和性别与 92 例孤立性近端 DVT 癌症患者相匹配)与无癌症 iDDVT 患者(按年龄和性别与 184 例相匹配)的死亡、VTE 复发和大出血发生率。

结果

与癌症相关孤立性近端 DVT 患者(n = 92)相比,癌症相关 iDDVT 患者(n = 92)的死亡风险相似(患者年 40.8% vs. 38.3%;aHR = 1.0,95%CI[0.7-1.4])和大出血风险(3.8% vs. 3.6%;aCHR = 0.9 [0.3-3.2])相似,VTE 复发风险较高(5.4% vs. 11.5%;aCHR = 1.8 [0.7-4.5])。与无癌症 iDDVT 患者(n = 184)相比,癌症相关 iDDVT 患者的死亡风险高 9 倍(3.5% vs. 38.3%;aHR = 9.3 [5.5-15.9]),大出血风险高(1.8% vs. 3.6%;aCHR = 2.0 [0.6-6.1]),VTE 复发风险高(5.0% vs. 11.5%;aCHR = 2.0 [1.0-3.7])。在没有 VTE 病史的患者亚组中,结果仍然相似。

结论

癌症相关 iDDVT 患者的预后似乎与癌症相关孤立性近端 DVT 患者相似,而与无癌症 iDDVT 患者相比,预后明显较差。这突显了癌症相关 iDDVT 的重要临床意义,并需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验