a Department of Medical Oncology , Austin Health, Olivia-Newton John Cancer and Wellness Centre , Victoria , Australia.
b University of Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Sep 2;13(9):2164-2178. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1277845. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
The success of immunotherapeutics over the past decade has fundamentally altered the therapeutic landscape in melanoma and non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer care. Multiple clinical trials have confirmed significant improvements in survival with a variety of immunotherapeutic strategies. The careful and appropriate selection of standard of care (SOC) therapies is key to the successful design and interpretation of these trials. To date immunotherapeutic trials have used best supportive care, matched placebo, chemotherapy, targeted therapy or, more recently, established immunotherapeutics in melanoma clinical trials as SOCs. Each of these SOC choices has a fundamental impact on the selection and validity of response assessment criteria and clinical endpoints. As yet there is no established approach, thus new data must be interpreted with an understanding of the limitations of the current paradigm. Additionally, the pace of development has mandated the use of novel clinical trial designs, answering multiple therapeutic questions simultaneously and designed to expedite regulatory approval. This review addresses the most important challenges in the selection of SOC in immunotherapeutic trials and the current and future challenges in trial design.
过去十年中免疫疗法的成功从根本上改变了黑色素瘤和非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 癌症治疗的治疗格局。多项临床试验证实,各种免疫治疗策略可显著提高生存率。仔细和适当选择标准治疗 (SOC) 疗法是成功设计和解释这些试验的关键。迄今为止,免疫治疗试验已经使用最佳支持治疗、匹配安慰剂、化疗、靶向治疗或最近的黑色素瘤临床试验中的既定免疫治疗作为 SOC。这些 SOC 选择中的每一种都对选择和评估反应标准和临床终点的有效性产生了根本影响。目前尚无既定方法,因此必须在了解当前范例局限性的情况下解释新数据。此外,发展速度要求使用新的临床试验设计,同时回答多个治疗问题,并旨在加快监管批准。这篇综述讨论了免疫治疗试验中选择 SOC 最重要的挑战,以及当前和未来试验设计中的挑战。