Suppr超能文献

纳武利尤单抗与伊匹木单抗联合用药对比伊匹木单抗单药治疗晚期黑色素瘤患者:一项多中心、随机、对照、2期试验的2年总生存结果

Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

作者信息

Hodi F Stephen, Chesney Jason, Pavlick Anna C, Robert Caroline, Grossmann Kenneth F, McDermott David F, Linette Gerald P, Meyer Nicolas, Giguere Jeffrey K, Agarwala Sanjiv S, Shaheen Montaser, Ernstoff Marc S, Minor David R, Salama April K, Taylor Matthew H, Ott Patrick A, Horak Christine, Gagnier Paul, Jiang Joel, Wolchok Jedd D, Postow Michael A

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1558-1568. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30366-7. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Results from phase 2 and 3 trials in patients with advanced melanoma have shown significant improvements in the proportion of patients achieving an objective response and prolonged progression-free survival with the combination of nivolumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 antibody) compared with ipilimumab alone. We report 2-year overall survival data from a randomised controlled trial assessing this treatment in previously untreated advanced melanoma.

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial (CheckMate 069) we recruited patients from 19 specialist cancer centres in two countries (France and the USA). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive an intravenous infusion of nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus placebo, every 3 weeks for four doses. Subsequently, patients assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients allocated to ipilimumab alone received placebo every 2 weeks during this phase. Randomisation was done via an interactive voice response system with a permuted block schedule (block size of six) and stratification by BRAF mutation status. The study funder, patients, investigators, and study site staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, which has been reported previously, was the proportion of patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma achieving an investigator-assessed objective response. Overall survival was an exploratory endpoint and is reported in this Article. Efficacy analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population, whereas safety was assessed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01927419, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 16, 2013, and Feb 6, 2014, we screened 179 patients and enrolled 142, randomly assigning 95 patients to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 47 to ipilimumab alone. In each treatment group, one patient no longer met the study criteria following randomisation and thus did not receive study drug. At a median follow-up of 24·5 months (IQR 9·1-25·7), 2-year overall survival was 63·8% (95% CI 53·3-72·6) for those assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 53·6% (95% CI 38·1-66·8) for those assigned to ipilimumab alone; median overall survival had not been reached in either group (hazard ratio 0·74, 95% CI 0·43-1·26; p=0·26). Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 51 (54%) of 94 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nine (20%) of 46 patients who received ipilimumab alone. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were colitis (12 [13%] of 94 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (ten [11%]) in the combination group and diarrhoea (five [11%] of 46 patients) and hypophysitis (two [4%]) in the ipilimumab alone group. Serious grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 34 (36%) of 94 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab (including colitis in ten [11%] of 94 patients, and diarrhoea in five [5%]) compared with four (9%) of 46 patients who received ipilimumab alone (including diarrhoea in two [4%] of 46 patients, colitis in one [2%], and hypophysitis in one [2%]). No new types of treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred in this updated analysis.

INTERPRETATION

Although follow-up of the patients in this study is ongoing, the results of this analysis suggest that the combination of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab might lead to improved outcomes compared with first-line ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma. The results suggest encouraging survival outcomes with immunotherapy in this population of patients.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

摘要

背景

2期和3期晚期黑色素瘤患者试验结果显示,与单独使用伊匹单抗相比,纳武单抗(一种抗PD-1抗体)联合伊匹单抗(一种抗CTLA-4抗体)治疗可使达到客观缓解的患者比例显著提高,无进展生存期延长。我们报告了一项随机对照试验的2年总生存数据,该试验评估了这种治疗方案用于既往未治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者的疗效。

方法

在这项多中心、双盲、随机、对照的2期试验(CheckMate 069)中,我们从两个国家(法国和美国)的19个专科癌症中心招募患者。符合条件的患者年龄在18岁及以上,患有既往未治疗、不可切除的III期或IV期黑色素瘤,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0或1。患者按2:1随机分组,每3周接受4次静脉输注,分别为纳武单抗1 mg/kg加伊匹单抗3 mg/kg,或伊匹单抗3 mg/kg加安慰剂。随后,分配到纳武单抗加伊匹单抗组的患者每2周接受3 mg/kg纳武单抗静脉输注,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性,而单独分配到伊匹单抗组的患者在此阶段每2周接受安慰剂静脉输注。随机分组通过交互式语音应答系统进行,采用置换区组设计(区组大小为6),并按BRAF突变状态分层。研究资助方、患者、研究者和研究现场工作人员均对治疗分配情况不知情。主要终点(此前已报告)是BRAF野生型黑色素瘤患者中达到研究者评估的客观缓解的比例。总生存是一个探索性终点,并在本文中报告。疗效分析在意向性治疗人群中进行,而安全性在所有接受至少一剂研究药物治疗的患者中评估。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT01927419,研究正在进行但不再招募患者。

结果

2013年9月16日至2014年2月6日期间,我们筛选了179例患者,纳入142例,随机将95例患者分配至纳武单抗加伊匹单抗组,47例患者分配至单独伊匹单抗组。在每个治疗组中,各有1例患者在随机分组后不再符合研究标准,因此未接受研究药物治疗。在中位数随访24.5个月(IQR 9.1 - 25.7)时,分配至纳武单抗加伊匹单抗组的患者2年总生存率为63.8%(95%CI 53.3 - 72.6),单独分配至伊匹单抗组的患者为53.6%(95%CI 38.1 - 66.8);两组的中位总生存均未达到(风险比0.74,95%CI 0.43 - 1.26;p = 0.26)。接受纳武单抗加伊匹单抗治疗的94例患者中有51例(54%)报告了3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件,而单独接受伊匹单抗治疗的46例患者中有9例(20%)报告了此类事件。联合治疗组最常见的3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件是结肠炎(94例患者中的12例[13%])和丙氨酸转氨酶升高(10例[11%]),单独伊匹单抗组是腹泻(46例患者中的5例[11%])和垂体炎(2例[4%])。接受纳武单抗加伊匹单抗治疗的94例患者中有34例(36%)报告了严重的3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件(包括94例患者中的10例[11%]结肠炎和5例[5%]腹泻), 单独接受伊匹单抗治疗的46例患者中有4例(9%)报告了此类事件(包括46例患者中的2例[4%]腹泻、1例[2%]结肠炎和1例[2%]垂体炎)。在本次更新分析中未出现新的治疗相关不良事件类型或治疗相关死亡。

解读

尽管本研究中患者的随访仍在进行,但该分析结果表明,对于晚期黑色素瘤患者,一线使用纳武单抗加伊匹单抗联合治疗可能比一线单独使用伊匹单抗产生更好的疗效。结果显示该人群采用免疫疗法的生存结局令人鼓舞。

资助

百时美施贵宝公司

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Vedolizumab: Beyond Inflammatory Bowel Disease.维多珠单抗:超越炎症性肠病
Med Princ Pract. 2025 Jun 19:1-13. doi: 10.1159/000547015.

本文引用的文献

5
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.帕博利珠单抗对比伊匹单抗用于晚期黑色素瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093. Epub 2015 Apr 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验