Paolin Adolfo, Trojan Diletta, Petit Pieter, Coato Paola, Rigoli Roberto
Treviso Tissue Bank Foundation, Treviso, Italy.
Foundation European Tissue Banks, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):e0173154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173154. eCollection 2017.
Microbiological contamination of retrieved tissues has become a very important topic and a critical aspect in the safety of allografts. We have analysed contamination in 11,129 tissues with a longitudinal contamination profile for each individual tissue. More specifically, 10,035 musculoskeletal tissues and 1,094 cardiovascular tissues were retrieved from a total of 763 multi-tissue donors, of whom 105 were heart-beating donors as well as organ donors, while the remaining 658 were non-heart beating donors and tissue donors only. All tissues were decontaminated twice, the first time immediately after retrieval and the second time after processing. Each tissue was submitted to microbiological culture three times, i.e., upon retrieval (Time 1), after the first decontamination (Time 2) and after the second decontamination (Time 3). The contamination rate for musculoskeletal tissues was 52%, 16.2% and 0.5% at Time 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The contamination rate for cardiovascular tissues was 84%, 42% and 6%. More than one strain was simultaneously present in 10.8% of musculoskeletal tissues and 44.6% of cardiovascular tissues. Out of 8,560 non-heart-beating donor musculoskeletal tissues, 4,689 (54.8%), 1,383 (16.2%) and 42 (0.5%) were contaminated at Time 1, Time 2 and Time 3, respectively. Out of 1,475 heart-beating donor musculoskeletal tissues, 522 (35.4%) 113 (7.7%) and 2 (0.1%) tissues were found to be contaminated at Time 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Out of 984 non-heart beating donor cardiovascular tissues, 869 (88.3%), 449 (45.6%) and 69 (7%) proved positive at Time 1, 2 and 3 respectively, while 50 (45.5%) and 10 (9.1%) heart-beating donor cardiovascular tissues were contaminated at Time 1 and 2. No tissue was contaminated at Time 3. Based on our methods, the two-step decontamination approach is mandatory in order to drastically reduce the number of tissues found to be positive at the end of the process.
回收组织的微生物污染已成为一个非常重要的话题,也是同种异体移植安全性的一个关键方面。我们分析了11129个组织的污染情况,并为每个组织建立了纵向污染概况。具体而言,从763名多组织捐赠者身上共回收了10035个肌肉骨骼组织和1094个心血管组织,其中105名是心脏跳动捐赠者兼器官捐赠者,其余658名是非心脏跳动捐赠者且仅为组织捐赠者。所有组织都进行了两次去污处理,第一次在回收后立即进行,第二次在处理后进行。每个组织都进行了三次微生物培养,即回收时(时间1)、第一次去污后(时间2)和第二次去污后(时间3)。肌肉骨骼组织在时间1、2和3时的污染率分别为52%、16.2%和0.5%。心血管组织的污染率分别为84%、42%和6%。10.8%的肌肉骨骼组织和44.6%的心血管组织同时存在一种以上菌株。在8560个非心脏跳动捐赠者的肌肉骨骼组织中,时间1、2和3时分别有4689个(54.8%)、1383个(16.2%)和42个(0.5%)被污染。在1475个心脏跳动捐赠者的肌肉骨骼组织中,时间1、2和3时分别有522个(35.4%)、113个(7.7%)和2个(0.1%)组织被发现受到污染。在984个非心脏跳动捐赠者的心血管组织中,时间1、2和3时分别有869个(88.3%)、449个(45.6%)和69个(7%)检测呈阳性,而在时间1和2时,分别有50个(45.5%)和10个(9.1%)心脏跳动捐赠者的心血管组织受到污染。在时间3时没有组织被污染。基于我们的方法,两步去污方法是必不可少的,以便大幅减少在该过程结束时检测呈阳性的组织数量。