Wåhlberg Henrik, Valle Per Christian, Malm Siri, Hovde Øistein, Broderstad Ann Ragnhild
Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway Harstad, St. Olavsgate 70, 9480, Harstad, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 7;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2127-1.
The assessment of quality of care is an integral part of modern medicine. The referral represents the handing over of care from the general practitioner to the specialist. This study aimed to assess whether an improved referral could lead to improved quality of care.
A cluster randomized trial with the general practitioner surgery as the clustering unit was performed. Fourteen surgeries in the area surrounding the University Hospital of North Norway Harstad were randomized stratified by town versus countryside location. The intervention consisted of implementing referral templates for new referrals in four clinical areas: dyspepsia; suspected colorectal cancer; chest pain; and confirmed or suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The control group followed standard referral practice. Quality of treatment pathway as assessed by newly developed quality indicators was used as main outcome. Secondary outcomes included subjective quality assessment, positive predictive value of referral and adequacy of prioritization. Assessment of outcomes was done at the individual level. The patients, hospital doctors and outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention status.
A total of 500 patients were included, with 281 in the intervention and 219 in the control arm. From the multilevel regression model the effect of the intervention on the quality indicator score was insignificant at 1.80% (95% CI, -1.46 to 5.06, p = 0.280). No significant differences between the intervention and the control groups were seen in the secondary outcomes. Active use of the referral intervention was low, estimated at approximately 50%. There was also wide variation in outcome scoring between the different assessors.
In this study no measurable effect on quality of care or prioritization was revealed after implementation of referral templates at the general practitioner/hospital interface. The results were hindered by a limited uptake of the intervention at GP surgeries and inconsistencies in outcome assessment.
The study was registered under registration number NCT01470963 on September 5th, 2011.
医疗质量评估是现代医学的一个重要组成部分。转诊意味着从全科医生向专科医生的医疗交接。本研究旨在评估改进转诊是否能提高医疗质量。
以全科医生诊所作为聚类单位进行了一项整群随机试验。挪威北部哈斯塔德大学医院周边地区的14家诊所按城镇与乡村位置进行分层随机分组。干预措施包括在四个临床领域为新转诊病例实施转诊模板:消化不良;疑似结直肠癌;胸痛;以及确诊或疑似慢性阻塞性肺疾病。对照组遵循标准转诊流程。以新制定的质量指标评估的治疗路径质量作为主要结局。次要结局包括主观质量评估、转诊的阳性预测值和优先排序的充分性。结局评估在个体层面进行。患者、医院医生和结局评估者对干预状态不知情。
共纳入500例患者,其中干预组281例,对照组219例。从多水平回归模型来看,干预对质量指标得分的影响不显著,为1.80%(95%CI,-1.46至5.06,p = 0.280)。干预组与对照组在次要结局方面未观察到显著差异。转诊干预措施的积极使用率较低,估计约为50%。不同评估者之间的结局评分也存在很大差异。
在本研究中,在全科医生/医院界面实施转诊模板后,未发现对医疗质量或优先排序有可测量的影响。研究结果受到全科医生诊所对干预措施的接受程度有限以及结局评估不一致的阻碍。
该研究于2011年9月5日在注册号为NCT01470963下注册。