Wåhlberg Henrik, Braaten Tonje, Broderstad Ann Ragnhild
Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway, Harstad, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 24;6(10):e011651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011651.
To evaluate if a referral intervention improves the patient experience of the referral and treatment process.
Interface between 14 primary care surgeries and a district general hospital.
The 14 general practitioner (GP) surgeries (7 intervention, 7 control) in the area around the University Hospital of North Norway Harstad were randomised and all completed the study. Consecutive individual patients were recruited at their hospital appointment. A total of 500 patients were recruited with 281 in the intervention and 219 in the control arm.
Dissemination of referral templates for 4 diagnostic groups (dyspepsia, suspected colorectal cancer, chest pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) coupled with intermittent surgery visits by study personnel. The control arm continued standard referral practice. The intervention was in use for 2.5 years.
The main outcome was a quality indicator score. This paper reports a secondary outcome, the patient experience, as measured by self-report questionnaires. GPs in the intervention group could not be blinded. Patients were blinded to intervention status. Analysis was based on single-question comparison with a questionnaire subscore used to assess the effect of clustering.
On the individual questions, overall satisfaction was very high with minor differences between the intervention and control group. Interestingly, the most negative responses, in both groups concerned questions relating to patient interaction and information. Very little evidence of clustering was found with an estimated intracluster correlations coefficient at 1.21e.
In total, this indicates no clear effect of the implementation of referral templates on the patient experience, in a setting of generally high patient satisfaction.
NCT01470963; Results.
评估转诊干预措施是否能改善患者在转诊及治疗过程中的体验。
14家基层医疗诊所与一家地区综合医院之间的衔接点。
挪威北海岸哈斯塔德大学医院周边地区的14家全科医生(GP)诊所(7家干预组,7家对照组)被随机分组,且均完成了研究。在患者预约就诊时招募连续的个体患者。共招募了500名患者,其中干预组281名,对照组219名。
针对4个诊断组(消化不良、疑似结直肠癌、胸痛和慢性阻塞性肺疾病)发放转诊模板,并由研究人员进行间歇性的门诊走访。对照组继续采用标准的转诊流程。干预措施实施了2.5年。
主要结果是质量指标得分。本文报告了一个次要结果,即通过自我报告问卷测量的患者体验。干预组的全科医生无法设盲。患者对干预状态不知情。分析基于与用于评估聚类效应的问卷子得分的单问题比较。
在各个问题上,总体满意度都很高,干预组和对照组之间差异不大。有趣的是,两组中最负面的回答都与患者互动和信息相关问题有关。几乎没有发现聚类的证据,估计组内相关系数为1.21e⁻⁴。
总体而言,这表明在患者总体满意度较高的情况下,实施转诊模板对患者体验没有明显影响。
NCT01470963;结果