Damm Julie A, Smith Birgitte, Greisen Gorm, Krogfelt Karen A, Clausen Maja-Lisa, Agner Tove
Department of Pediatrics, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institute, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 May;309(4):259-264. doi: 10.1007/s00403-017-1725-4. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
Probiotic supplementation is a promising preventive strategy for atopic dermatitis (AD). To help clarifying the significance of timing with respect to prevention of AD, we here evaluate the benefit of prophylactic use of probiotic supplementation in neonates younger than 30 weeks of gestation. Preterm children from the Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark from two different admission periods were included in a historically controlled cohort study. Neonates from January 2007 to February 2010, not treated with and neonates from March 2010 to February 2013 treated with probiotic were enrolled. Main outcome was prevalence of AD, and secondary outcomes were use of topical corticosteroids, and number of skin-related visits to GPs and dermatologists. 527 preterm neonates were included in the study, 249 treated and 278 not treated with probiotics. Response rate for the two cohorts was 76.7 and 77.7% respectively. The prevalence of AD was similar in the two groups (20.9% in the probiotic treated group versus 17.1% in the not treated group, p = 0.33). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to treatment with topical corticosteroids, or visits at GPs or dermatologist. We found no indication that probiotics may prevent AD when administered to neonates <30 gestation weeks from birth until discharge home. Factors influencing the early maturation of the immune system have been assumed to be of particular importance in atopic dermatitis, and hence, our unique cohorts contribute information on how probiotic supplementation may affect the extremely immature immune systems of preterm infants.
补充益生菌是一种有前景的特应性皮炎(AD)预防策略。为了帮助阐明补充益生菌预防AD的时机的重要性,我们在此评估对孕周小于30周的新生儿预防性使用益生菌补充剂的益处。来自丹麦里格霍斯医院新生儿科两个不同入院时期的早产儿被纳入一项历史对照队列研究。纳入了2007年1月至2010年2月未接受益生菌治疗的新生儿以及2010年3月至2013年2月接受益生菌治疗的新生儿。主要结局是AD的患病率,次要结局是局部使用皮质类固醇的情况以及看全科医生和皮肤科医生的皮肤相关就诊次数。527名早产儿被纳入研究,249名接受了益生菌治疗,278名未接受益生菌治疗。两个队列的应答率分别为76.7%和77.7%。两组AD的患病率相似(益生菌治疗组为20.9%,未治疗组为17.1%,p = 0.33)。在局部使用皮质类固醇治疗或看全科医生或皮肤科医生方面,两组之间未发现显著差异。我们发现没有迹象表明,对出生至出院时孕周<30周的新生儿给予益生菌可预防AD。影响免疫系统早期成熟的因素被认为在特应性皮炎中尤为重要,因此,我们独特的队列提供了关于补充益生菌如何影响早产儿极其不成熟的免疫系统的信息。