Lucan Sean C, Maroko Andrew R, Sanon Omar C, Schechter Clyde B
Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Block Building, Room 410, Bronx, NY, 10461-1900, USA.
Department of Health Sciences, Lehman College, City University of New York, Bronx, NY, USA.
J Urban Health. 2017 Apr;94(2):220-232. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0127-9.
Unhealthful food-and-beverage advertising often targets vulnerable groups. The extent of such advertising in subway stations has not been reported and it is not clear how ad placement may relate to subway ridership or community demographics, or what the implications might be for diets and diet-related health in surrounding communities. Riding all subway lines (n = 7) in the Bronx, NY, USA, investigators systematically assessed all print ads (n = 1586) in all stations (n = 68) in 2012. Data about subway ridership came from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Demographic data on surrounding residential areas came from the U.S. Census Bureau. Data on dietary intake and diet-related conditions came from a city health-department survey. There were no ads promoting "more-healthful" food-or-beverage items (i.e., fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, water or milk). There were many ads for "less-healthful" items (e.g., candies, chips, sugary cereals, frozen pizzas, "energy" drinks, coffee confections, hard alcohol, and beer). Ad placement did not relate to the number of riders entering at stations. Instead, exposure to food-or-beverage ads generally, and to "less-healthful" ads particularly (specifically ads in Spanish, directed at youth, and/or featuring minorities), was directly correlated with poverty, lower high-school graduation rates, higher percentages of Hispanics, and/or higher percentages of children in surrounding residential areas. Correlations were robust to sensitivity analyses. Additional analyses suggested correlations between ad exposures and sugary-drink consumption, fruit-and-vegetable intake, and diabetes, hypertension, and high-cholesterol rates. Subway-station ads for "less-healthful" items were located disproportionately in areas home to vulnerable populations facing diet and diet-related-health challenges. The fact that uneven ad placement did not relate to total rider counts suggests ads were not directed at the largest possible audiences but rather targeted to specific groups.
不健康的食品和饮料广告常常将弱势群体作为目标对象。地铁站这类广告的投放程度尚未见报道,广告投放与地铁客流量、社区人口统计学特征之间的关系也不清楚,其对周边社区饮食及与饮食相关健康状况的影响也尚不明确。美国纽约市布朗克斯区的研究人员乘坐了所有7条地铁线路,于2012年系统评估了68个地铁站里的所有平面广告(共1586则)。地铁客流量数据来自大都会运输署。周边居民区的人口统计学数据来自美国人口普查局。饮食摄入量及与饮食相关疾病的数据来自一项城市卫生部门的调查。没有广告宣传“更健康的”食品或饮料(即水果、蔬菜、全谷物、坚果、水或牛奶)。有许多广告宣传“不太健康的”食品(如糖果、薯片、含糖谷物、冷冻披萨、“能量”饮料、咖啡糖、烈性酒和啤酒)。广告投放与各站点进站乘客数量无关。相反,总体上接触食品或饮料广告,尤其是接触“不太健康的”广告(特别是西班牙语广告、针对青少年的广告和/或有少数族裔形象的广告),与周边居民区的贫困、较低的高中毕业生率、较高的西班牙裔人口比例和/或较高的儿童人口比例直接相关。这些相关性在敏感性分析中表现稳健。进一步分析表明,广告接触与含糖饮料消费、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及糖尿病、高血压和高胆固醇发病率之间存在相关性。宣传“不太健康的”食品的地铁站广告在面临饮食及与饮食相关健康挑战的弱势群体居住地区分布不均。广告投放不均与总客流量无关这一事实表明,广告并非针对尽可能多的受众,而是针对特定群体。