Soares F Z M, Lenzi T L, de Oliveira Rocha R
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Dental Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017 Apr;18(2):113-118. doi: 10.1007/s40368-017-0282-z. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
To evaluate the water storage degradation of resin-dentine bonds of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent human dentine.
Flat occlusal human dentine surfaces of 15 primary molars and 15 permanent molars were randomly assigned according to adhesive systems: Adper Single Bond 2; Clearfil SE Bond and One Up Bond F Plus. After bonding procedures, the adhesives were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions and composite resin blocks were built. Restored teeth were sectioned rendering rectangular sticks (RS) (0.4 mm). The RS were submitted to microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test according to the water storage time: 24 h, 1-year, and 2-years. Mean µTBS values were analysed by three-way analysis of variance (mixed design) and Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05). The failure mode was analysed at 400× magnification.
All three factors isolated showed significant influences on µTBS, as did the cross-product interactions between material vs. storage time (p = 0.01) and substrate vs. storage time (p = 0.002). Bond strength means to primary dentine were lower than to permanent dentine (34.7 ± 10.1 and 45.8 ± 12.9 mPa, respectively) after 2-years of water storage. The one-step self-etch adhesive (One Up Bond F Plus) showed less stable bond strength after 2-years of water storage.
The resin-dentine bond of primary teeth was more prone to degradation over time compared to permanent dentine.
评估不同粘结系统与人类乳牙和恒牙牙本质之间粘结的储水降解情况。
将15颗乳牙和15颗恒牙的平坦咬合面牙本质表面根据粘结系统随机分组:Adper Single Bond 2;Clearfil SE Bond和One Up Bond F Plus。粘结程序完成后,按照制造商的说明涂抹粘结剂并构建复合树脂块。将修复后的牙齿切片制成矩形棒(RS)(0.4毫米)。根据储水时间:24小时、1年和2年,对RS进行微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)测试。通过三因素方差分析(混合设计)和Tukey事后检验(α = 0.05)分析平均µTBS值。在400倍放大倍数下分析失效模式。
所有三个独立因素均对µTBS有显著影响,材料与储存时间(p = 0.01)以及基底与储存时间(p = 0.002)之间的交叉乘积交互作用也有显著影响。储水2年后,与恒牙牙本质相比,乳牙牙本质的粘结强度均值较低(分别为34.7±10.1和45.8±12.9兆帕)。储水2年后,一步自酸蚀粘结剂(One Up Bond F Plus)的粘结强度稳定性较差。
与恒牙牙本质相比,乳牙的树脂-牙本质粘结随着时间的推移更容易降解。