Suppr超能文献

一步法自酸蚀系统对健康乳牙和恒牙牙本质的粘结效果。

Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin.

作者信息

Uekusa Satoshi, Yamaguchi Kanako, Miyazaki Masashi, Tsubota Keishi, Kurokawa Hiroyasu, Hosoya Yumiko

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon University Graduate School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;31(5):569-76. doi: 10.2341/05-102.

Abstract

Currently, there is little information regarding the bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to primary tooth dentin. This study examined the microtensile bond strength of single-step self-etch systems (Clearfil tri-S Bond and One-Up Bond F Plus) to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Adhesives were applied to flat samples of primary and permanent tooth dentin, and resin composites were bonded according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours of storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C, hour glass-shaped specimens were produced. They were subjected to microtensile testing at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The results were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey HSD post-hoc test (alpha=0.05). Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) observations of the adhesive-treated dentin surfaces and the resin/dentin interface were also conducted. The bond strengths of primary tooth dentin were significantly lower than that of permanent tooth dentin for both self-etch systems: 44.7 +/- 10.4 versus 54.3 +/- 9.0 MPa for Clearfil tri-S Bond and 40.6 +/- 9.9 versus 50.0 +/- 8.7 MPa for One-Up Bond F Plus (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant interaction between the type of adhesive system and the dentin substrate (p=0.957). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the mean values among the different adhesive systems (p=0.094), there was a statistically significant difference in mean values among the different dentin substrates (p<0.001), which were lower for primary tooth dentin than for permanent tooth dentin. The failure modes were also independent of the type of dentin but dependent on the adhesive systems, an equal distribution among the 3 types of failure for Clearfil tri-S Bond and cohesive failures in adhesives for One-Up Bond F Plus. FE-SEM observations of dentin to which adhesive had been applied revealed that the smear layer had been removed and the collagen fibers exposed. Though the bond strengths to primary tooth dentin were lower than to permanent tooth dentin, excellent adaptation of the single-step self-etch systems to both dentin substrates was observed by FE-SEM. Further studies are required to determine the long-term clinical performance of these adhesive systems when applied to primary tooth dentin.

摘要

目前,关于单步自酸蚀系统与乳牙牙本质的粘结效果的信息很少。本研究检测了单步自酸蚀系统(Clearfil tri-S Bond和One-Up Bond F Plus)与健康乳牙和恒牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。将粘合剂应用于乳牙和恒牙牙本质的扁平样本上,并按照制造商的说明粘结树脂复合材料。在37℃蒸馏水中储存24小时后,制作沙漏形标本。以1.0毫米/分钟的十字头速度对其进行微拉伸测试。结果采用双向方差分析(ANOVA),随后进行Tukey HSD事后检验(α = 0.05)进行分析。还对粘合剂处理过的牙本质表面和树脂/牙本质界面进行了场发射扫描电子显微镜(FE-SEM)观察。两种自酸蚀系统中,乳牙牙本质的粘结强度均显著低于恒牙牙本质:Clearfil tri-S Bond为44.7±10.4 MPa,而恒牙牙本质为54.3±9.0 MPa;One-Up Bond F Plus为40.6±9.9 MPa,而恒牙牙本质为50.0±8.7 MPa(p<0.001)。粘合剂系统类型与牙本质基质之间无统计学显著交互作用(p = 0.957)。虽然不同粘合剂系统的平均值之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.094),但不同牙本质基质的平均值之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001),乳牙牙本质的平均值低于恒牙牙本质。失效模式也与牙本质类型无关,但与粘合剂系统有关,Clearfil tri-S Bond的三种失效类型分布均匀,而One-Up Bond F Plus的粘合剂出现内聚破坏。对涂有粘合剂的牙本质进行FE-SEM观察发现,玷污层已被去除,胶原纤维暴露。尽管与乳牙牙本质的粘结强度低于恒牙牙本质,但通过FE-SEM观察到单步自酸蚀系统对两种牙本质基质均有良好的适应性。需要进一步研究以确定这些粘合剂系统应用于乳牙牙本质时的长期临床性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验