Naaim Alexandre, Moissenet Florent, Duprey Sonia, Begon Mickaël, Chèze Laurence
CIC INSERM 1432, Plateforme d'Investigation Technologique, CHU Dijon, France; Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, F69622 Lyon, France.
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, 1 rue André Vésale, L-2674 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
J Biomech. 2017 Sep 6;62:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
Soft tissue artefacts (STA) introduce errors in joint kinematics when using cutaneous markers, especially on the scapula. Both segmental optimisation and multibody kinematics optimisation (MKO) algorithms have been developed to improve kinematics estimates. MKO based on a chain model with joint constraints avoids apparent joint dislocation but is sensitive to the biofidelity of chosen joint constraints. Since no recommendation exists for the scapula, our objective was to determine the best models to accurately estimate its kinematics. One participant was equipped with skin markers and with an intracortical pin screwed in the scapula. Segmental optimisation and MKO for 24-chain models (including four variations of the scapulothoracic joint) were compared against the pin-derived kinematics using root mean square error (RMSE) on Cardan angles. Segmental optimisation led to an accurate scapula kinematics (1.1°≤RMSE≤3.3°) even for high arm elevation angles. When MKO was applied, no clinically significant difference was found between the different scapulothoracic models (0.9°≤RMSE≤4.1°) except when a free scapulothoracic joint was modelled (1.9°≤RMSE≤9.6°). To conclude, using MKO as a STA correction method was not more accurate than segmental optimisation for estimating scapula kinematics.
在使用皮肤标记物时,软组织伪影(STA)会在关节运动学中引入误差,尤其是在肩胛骨上。为了改进运动学估计,已经开发了节段优化和多体运动学优化(MKO)算法。基于具有关节约束的链模型的MKO可避免明显的关节脱位,但对所选关节约束的生物逼真度敏感。由于对于肩胛骨尚无相关建议,我们的目标是确定能准确估计其运动学的最佳模型。一名参与者身上配备了皮肤标记物,并在肩胛骨上拧入了一枚皮质内针。使用关于Cardan角的均方根误差(RMSE),将24链模型(包括肩胛胸关节的四种变体)的节段优化和MKO与基于针的运动学进行比较。即使在高臂抬高角度下,节段优化也能得出准确的肩胛骨运动学结果(1.1°≤RMSE≤3.3°)。当应用MKO时,除了对自由肩胛胸关节进行建模的情况(1.9°≤RMSE≤9.6°)外,不同肩胛胸模型之间未发现临床显著差异(0.9°≤RMSE≤4.1°)。总之,在估计肩胛骨运动学时,使用MKO作为STA校正方法并不比节段优化更准确。