Mahmood Feroze, Knio Ziyad O, Yeh Lu, Amir Rabia, Matyal Robina, Mashari Azad, Gorman Robert C, Gorman Joseph H, Khabbaz Kamal R
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Apr;103(4):1171-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.083. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Apical displacement of the coaptation point of the mitral valve (MV) in response to ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) represents remodeling of the MV apparatus. Whereas it implies chronicity, it lacks specificity in discriminating normal from a significantly remodeled MV apparatus. Regional aspects of MV remodeling have shown superior value over global remodeling in predicting recurrence after MV repair for IMR. Quite possibly, presence of specific regional changes in MV geometry that are unique to chronic IMR patients could also be used to diagnose the presence and track progression of remodeling. Knowledge of these changes in MV apparatus in patients with IMR can possibly be used to identify patients for surgical intervention before irreversible remodeling occurs.
Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic data were collected from patients who underwent MV surgery for IMR (IMR group, n = 66), and from patients with normal valvular and biventricular function (control group, n = 10). The acquired data of the MV were geometrically analyzed to make regional comparisons between the IMR and the control group to identify measurements that reliably differentiate normal from remodeled MVs.
Lengthening of the middle potion of the anterior annulus (A2 regional perimeter: 11.149 mm versus 9.798 mm, p = 0.0041), larger nonplanarity angle (147.985 versus 140.720 degrees, p = 0.0459), and increased tenting angle of the posteromedial scallop of the posterior leaflet (P3 tenting angle: 44.354 versus 40.461 degrees, p = 0.0435) were sufficient in differentiating between IMR and the control group.
Specific three-dimensional changes in MV geometry can be used to reliably identify a significantly remodeled valve apparatus.
二尖瓣(MV)对缺血性二尖瓣反流(IMR)的瓣叶贴合点顶端移位代表了MV装置的重塑。尽管这意味着慢性化,但在区分正常与显著重塑的MV装置方面缺乏特异性。MV重塑的局部特征在预测IMR的MV修复术后复发方面已显示出比整体重塑更具优势。很有可能,慢性IMR患者特有的MV几何形状的特定局部变化也可用于诊断重塑的存在并追踪其进展。了解IMR患者MV装置的这些变化可能有助于在不可逆重塑发生前识别适合手术干预的患者。
收集接受IMR的MV手术患者(IMR组,n = 66)以及瓣膜和双心室功能正常的患者(对照组,n = 10)的三维经食管超声心动图数据。对获取的MV数据进行几何分析,以在IMR组和对照组之间进行局部比较,从而确定能够可靠区分正常与重塑MV的测量指标。
前瓣环中部延长(A2区域周长:11.149 mm对9.798 mm,p = 0.0041)、更大的非平面角(147.985对140.720度,p = 0.0459)以及后叶后内侧扇贝形瓣叶的帐篷样角度增加(P3帐篷样角度:44.354对40.461度,p = 0.0435)足以区分IMR组和对照组。
MV几何形状的特定三维变化可用于可靠地识别显著重塑的瓣膜装置。