Park Myung Jae, Rhee Chin Kook, Kim Yee Hyung, Kim Do Jin, Kim Dong Gyu, Lee Sang Yeub, Kim Jae Yeol
a Kyung Hee University School of Medicine , Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
b The Catholic University of Korea , Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine , Seoul , Republic of Korea.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):919-925. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1295030. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
The efficacy and safety of Chinese herbs for symptomatic treatment of bronchitis is not well established. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination product of seven herbs (HL301) for the treatment of acute bronchitis (AB) and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial design.
A total of 160 patients with AB or with AECB were randomized to receive placebo or one of three doses of HL301 (0.6 g/day, 1.2 g/day, or 1.8 g/day) for a total of 7 days. The primary study endpoint was the change in bronchitis severity score (BSS) from the baseline visit (visit 2) to the end of treatment visit (visit 3). Other efficacy variables were percentage BSS systemic sign efficacy after treatment and change in individual BSS parameters after treatment.
Changes in BSS from visit 2 to visit 3 in the three treatment groups (4.63 ± 2.24, 4.08 ± 1.63, and 4.15 ± 1.74 in the HL301 0.6 g/day, 1.2 g/day, and 1.8 g/day groups, respectively) were higher than that of the placebo group (2.88 ± 2.57) in the per protocol set (PPS) (P < .05), and it was also valid in the full analysis set (FAS). The number of participants whose symptoms (measured by BSS) improved at least 30% after treatment was higher in all three treatment groups compared to the placebo group in both the FAS and the PPS (P < .05, for all).
Three different doses of HL301 (0.6 g/day, 1.2 g/day, and 1.8 g/day) were effective in decreasing the BSS index compared to placebo. HL301 may be effective for symptomatic treatment of both AB and AECB.
Essential components of HL301 have not been delineated in the study and patients with AB and AECB were indiscriminately enrolled in the present study. Respective evaluation of the efficacy of HL301 for AB and AECB will be necessary in the future.
中药对症治疗支气管炎的有效性和安全性尚未明确。我们采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验设计,评估了一种七味草药组合产品(HL301)治疗急性支气管炎(AB)和慢性支气管炎急性加重期(AECB)的有效性和安全性。
总共160例AB或AECB患者被随机分组,接受安慰剂或三种剂量HL301之一(0.6克/天、1.2克/天或1.8克/天)治疗,共7天。主要研究终点是从基线访视(访视2)到治疗结束访视(访视3)支气管炎严重程度评分(BSS)的变化。其他疗效变量包括治疗后BSS全身症状疗效百分比以及治疗后各个BSS参数的变化。
在意向性分析集(PPS)中,三个治疗组从访视2到访视3的BSS变化(HL301 0.6克/天组为4.63±2.24,1.2克/天组为4.08±1.63,1.8克/天组为4.15±1.74)高于安慰剂组(2.88±2.57)(P<0.05),在全分析集(FAS)中同样有效。在FAS和PPS中,所有三个治疗组中治疗后症状(通过BSS衡量)改善至少30%的参与者数量均高于安慰剂组(所有P<0.05)。
与安慰剂相比,三种不同剂量的HL301(0.6克/天、1.2克/天和1.8克/天)在降低BSS指数方面有效。HL301可能对AB和AECB的对症治疗均有效。
本研究未明确HL301的关键成分,且本研究中AB和AECB患者未进行区分纳入。未来有必要分别评估HL301对AB和AECB的疗效。