Suppr超能文献

HL301 治疗急性支气管炎的 2b 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究。

HL301 in the treatment of acute bronchitis: a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):133-141. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.181. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is insufficient quality data to recommend the use of herbs for the treatment of acute bronchitis. Small number of randomized trials of plant extracts for this purpose were determined to be low quality and there are concerns for the safety. HL301 is a combined product of seven medicinal plants. In the present study, we tried to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HL301 for the treatment of acute bronchitis with a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial design.

METHODS

A total of 166 patients with acute bronchitis were randomized to receive placebo or HL301 (600 mg/day) for 7 days. The primary endpoint was change in bronchitis severity score (BSS) from baseline visit (visit 2) to the end of treatment (visit 3). Other efficacy variables were the change of each component of the BSS (cough, sputum, dyspnea, chest pain, and crackle) with treatment, response rate, improvement rate, satisfaction rate and number of rescue medications taken.

RESULTS

Changes in the BSS from visit 2 to visit 3 were higher in the HL301 group than in the placebo group both in the full analysis set (4.57 ± 1.82 vs. 3.15 ± 3.08, p < 0.01) and in the per protocol set (4.62 ± 1.81 vs. 3.30 ± 3.03, p < 0.01). Four BSS components (cough, sputum, dyspnea, and chest pain) improved more with HL301 treatment than with placebo treatment. Participants treated with HL301 showed higher response, improvement, and satisfaction rates and less use of rescue medication than the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

HL301 (600 mg/day) was effective and safe for symptomatic treatment of acute bronchitis.

摘要

背景/目的:目前尚无足够的质量数据推荐使用草药治疗急性支气管炎。为此目的进行的少数植物提取物随机试验被确定为低质量,并且存在安全性问题。 HL301 是七种药用植物的组合产品。在本研究中,我们试图通过随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验设计评估 HL301 治疗急性支气管炎的疗效和安全性。

方法

共有 166 例急性支气管炎患者被随机分为安慰剂组或 HL301 组(600mg/天),疗程为 7 天。主要终点是从基线访视(访视 2)到治疗结束时(访视 3)的支气管炎严重程度评分(BSS)变化。其他疗效变量包括治疗时 BSS 的每个组成部分(咳嗽、痰、呼吸困难、胸痛和爆裂声)的变化、应答率、改善率、满意度和服用的急救药物数量。

结果

在全分析集(4.57 ± 1.82 对 3.15 ± 3.08,p < 0.01)和意向治疗集(4.62 ± 1.81 对 3.30 ± 3.03,p < 0.01)中,HL301 组从访视 2 到访视 3 的 BSS 变化均高于安慰剂组。四项 BSS 组成部分(咳嗽、痰、呼吸困难和胸痛)在 HL301 治疗组中比安慰剂治疗组改善更明显。与安慰剂组相比,接受 HL301 治疗的患者显示出更高的应答、改善和满意度,并且使用急救药物的次数更少。

结论

HL301(600mg/天)对急性支气管炎的症状治疗有效且安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fba6/6960049/4eb3d3c52cde/kjim-2018-181f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验