Suppr超能文献

肝门部胆管癌ALPPS术后高死亡率:病例对照分析,包括国际ALPPS注册研究的首个系列病例

High mortality after ALPPS for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: case-control analysis including the first series from the international ALPPS registry.

作者信息

Olthof Pim B, Coelen Robert J S, Wiggers Jimme K, Groot Koerkamp Bas, Malago Massimo, Hernandez-Alejandro Roberto, Topp Stefan A, Vivarelli Marco, Aldrighetti Luca A, Robles Campos Ricardo, Oldhafer Karl J, Jarnagin William R, van Gulik Thomas M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2017 May;19(5):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.10.008. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) entails high-risk surgery with postoperative mortality reported up to 18%, even in specialized centers. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of PHC patients who underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) to patients who underwent resection without ALPPS.

METHODS

All patients who underwent ALPPS for PHC were identified from the international ALPPS registry and matched controls were selected from a standard resection cohort from two centers based on future remnant liver size. Outcomes included morbidity, mortality, and overall survival.

RESULTS

ALPPS for PHC was associated with 48% (14/29) 90-day mortality. 90-day mortality was 13% in 257 patients who underwent major liver resection for PHC without ALPPS. The 29 ALPPS patients were matched to 29 patients resected without ALPPS, with similar future liver remnant volume (P = 0.480). Mortality in the matched control group was 24% (P = 0.100) and median OS was 27 months, comparted to 6 months after ALPPS (P = 0.064).

DISCUSSION

Outcomes of ALPPS for PHC appear inferior compared to standard extended resections in high-risk patients. Therefore, portal vein embolization should remain the preferred method to increase future remnant liver volume in patients with PHC. ALPPS is not recommended for PHC.

摘要

引言

肝门部胆管癌(PHC)切除术属于高风险手术,即便在专业中心,术后死亡率也高达18%。本研究旨在比较接受联合肝脏分隔和门静脉结扎分期肝切除术(ALPPS)的PHC患者与未接受ALPPS切除术患者的治疗结果。

方法

从国际ALPPS登记处确定所有接受ALPPS治疗PHC的患者,并根据未来剩余肝体积从两个中心的标准切除队列中选择匹配对照。结果包括发病率、死亡率和总生存期。

结果

PHC的ALPPS与48%(14/29)的90天死亡率相关。在257例未接受ALPPS的PHC大肝切除术患者中,90天死亡率为13%。29例接受ALPPS的患者与29例未接受ALPPS的切除患者相匹配,未来肝剩余体积相似(P = 0.480)。匹配对照组的死亡率为24%(P = 0.100),中位总生存期为27个月,而ALPPS后为6个月(P = 0.064)。

讨论

与高危患者的标准扩大切除术相比,PHC的ALPPS治疗结果似乎较差。因此,门静脉栓塞仍应是增加PHC患者未来剩余肝体积的首选方法。不建议对PHC患者采用ALPPS。

相似文献

2
Chance and challenge of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019 Jun;18(3):214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
Importance of primary indication and liver function between stages: results of a multicenter Italian audit of ALPPS 2012-2014.
HPB (Oxford). 2016 May;18(5):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
6
ALPPS procedure: our experience and state of the art.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):2069-75.
7
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure for cholangiocarcinoma.
Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82S:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.045. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Stage I-laparoscopy partial ALPPS procedure for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;121(6):1022-1026. doi: 10.1002/jso.25868. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Modern work-up and extended resection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: the AMC experience.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 May;403(3):289-307. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1649-2. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

3
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's perspective.
ILIVER. 2022 Apr 5;1(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.iliver.2022.03.004. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 28;15(23):5613. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235613.
9
Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Sep 8;7(6):848-855. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12734. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Comparison of clinical efficacy between LAPS and ALPPS in the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Oct 12;11:goad060. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad060. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

5
Survival after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma-development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram.
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1930-1935. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv279. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the International ALPPS Registry.
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):829-36; discussion 836-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000947.
9
Indications for portal vein embolization in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Aug;21(8):542-9. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.77. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
10
In situ split of the liver when portal venous embolization fails to induce hypertrophy: a report of two cases.
Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:238675. doi: 10.1155/2013/238675. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验