Schomaker Judith, Walper Daniel, Wittmann Bianca C, Einhäuser Wolfgang
Justus Liebig University Giessen, Department of Psychology and Sports Science, Germany.
Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Physics of Cognition, Germany.
Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
In addition to low-level stimulus characteristics and current goals, our previous experience with stimuli can also guide attentional deployment. It remains unclear, however, if such effects act independently or whether they interact in guiding attention. In the current study, we presented natural scenes including every-day objects that differed in affective-motivational impact. In the first free-viewing experiment, we presented visually-matched triads of scenes in which one critical object was replaced that varied mainly in terms of motivational value, but also in terms of valence and arousal, as confirmed by ratings by a large set of observers. Treating motivation as a categorical factor, we found that it affected gaze. A linear-effect model showed that arousal, valence, and motivation predicted fixations above and beyond visual characteristics, like object size, eccentricity, or visual salience. In a second experiment, we experimentally investigated whether the effects of emotion and motivation could be modulated by visual salience. In a medium-salience condition, we presented the same unmodified scenes as in the first experiment. In a high-salience condition, we retained the saturation of the critical object in the scene, and decreased the saturation of the background, and in a low-salience condition, we desaturated the critical object while retaining the original saturation of the background. We found that highly salient objects guided gaze, but still found additional additive effects of arousal, valence and motivation, confirming that higher-level factors can also guide attention, as measured by fixations towards objects in natural scenes.
除了低层次的刺激特征和当前目标外,我们先前对刺激的体验也能引导注意力的分配。然而,尚不清楚这些效应是独立起作用,还是在引导注意力时相互作用。在当前的研究中,我们呈现了包含具有不同情感动机影响的日常物体的自然场景。在第一个自由观看实验中,我们呈现了视觉上匹配的三组场景,其中一个关键物体被替换,该物体主要在动机价值方面有所不同,但在效价和唤醒度方面也存在差异,这一点得到了大量观察者评分的证实。将动机视为一个分类因素,我们发现它会影响注视。一个线性效应模型表明,唤醒度、效价和动机能够预测注视点,且超出了诸如物体大小、离心率或视觉显著性等视觉特征的影响。在第二个实验中,我们通过实验研究了情绪和动机的效应是否会受到视觉显著性的调节。在中等显著性条件下,我们呈现了与第一个实验中相同的未修改场景。在高显著性条件下,我们保留了场景中关键物体的饱和度,并降低了背景的饱和度,而在低显著性条件下,我们降低了关键物体的饱和度,同时保留了背景的原始饱和度。我们发现,高显著性物体引导了注视,但仍然发现了唤醒度、效价和动机的额外累加效应,这证实了更高层次的因素也能够引导注意力,这一点通过对自然场景中物体的注视来衡量。