• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术治疗Ⅲ类骨性错牙合畸形时,传统正颌手术与手术优先正颌方法术后稳定性的比较研究

Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction.

作者信息

Mah Deuk-Hyun, Kim Su-Gwan, Oh Ji-Su, You Jae-Seek, Jung Seo-Yun, Kim Won-Gi, Yu Kyung-Hwan

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;43(1):23-28. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.23. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

DOI:10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.23
PMID:28280706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5342968/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative stability of conventional orthognathic surgery to a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 20 patients who underwent BSSRO for skeletal class III conventional orthognathic surgery and 20 patients who underwent a surgery-first orthognathic approach. Serial lateral cephalograms were analyzed to identify skeletal changes before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and after surgery (T2, after 1 year or at debonding).

RESULTS

The amount of relapse of the mandible in the conventional orthognathic surgery group from T1 to T2 was 2.23±0.92 mm (<0.01) forward movement and -0.87±0.57 mm (non-significant, NS) upward movement on the basis of point B and 2.54±1.37 mm (<0.01) forward movement and -1.18±0.79 mm (NS) upward movement on the basis of the pogonion (Pog) point. The relapse amount of the mandible in the surgery-first orthognathic approach group from T1 to T2 was 3.49±1.71 mm (<0.01) forward movement and -1.78±0.81 mm (<0.01) upward movement on the basis of the point B and 4.11±1.93 mm (<0.01) forward movement and -2.40±0.98 mm (<0.01) upward movement on the basis of the Pog.

CONCLUSION

The greater horizontal and vertical relapse may appear because of counter-clockwise rotation of the mandible in surgery-first orthognathic approach. Therefore, careful planning and skeletal stability should be considered in orthognathic surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较双侧矢状劈开下颌支截骨术(BSSRO)后传统正颌手术与手术优先正颌方法的术后稳定性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入20例行BSSRO的Ⅲ类骨骼畸形传统正颌手术患者和20例行手术优先正颌方法的患者。分析系列头颅侧位片,以确定术前(T0)、术后即刻(T1)及术后(T2,1年后或拆除矫治器时)的骨骼变化。

结果

传统正颌手术组下颌骨从T1到T2的复发量,以B点为基准,向前移动2.23±0.92 mm(<0.01),向上移动-0.87±0.57 mm(无显著性差异,NS);以颏前点(Pog)为基准,向前移动2.54±1.37 mm(<0.01),向上移动-1.18±0.79 mm(NS)。手术优先正颌方法组下颌骨从T1到T2的复发量,以B点为基准,向前移动3.49±1.71 mm(<0.01),向上移动-1.78±0.81 mm(<0.01);以Pog为基准,向前移动4.11±1.93 mm(<0.01),向上移动-2.40±0.98 mm(<0.01)。

结论

手术优先正颌方法中,下颌骨逆时针旋转可能导致更大的水平和垂直复发。因此,正颌手术应考虑仔细规划和骨骼稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/cede3e1bd5db/jkaoms-43-23-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/35537f51386c/jkaoms-43-23-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/436839e655cf/jkaoms-43-23-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/cede3e1bd5db/jkaoms-43-23-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/35537f51386c/jkaoms-43-23-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/436839e655cf/jkaoms-43-23-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af75/5342968/cede3e1bd5db/jkaoms-43-23-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction.双侧矢状劈开下颌升支截骨术治疗Ⅲ类骨性错牙合畸形时,传统正颌手术与手术优先正颌方法术后稳定性的比较研究
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;43(1):23-28. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.23. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
2
Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.双颌手术治疗骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的外科优先治疗方法:手术移动及术后正畸治疗的评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Mar;21(2):332-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4.
3
The Direction of Double-Jaw Surgery Relapse for Correction of Skeletal Class III Deformity: Bilateral Sagittal Split Versus Intraoral Vertical Ramus Setback Osteotomies.用于矫正骨性III类畸形的双颌手术复发方向:双侧矢状劈开术与口内垂直升支后退截骨术对比
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019 Jun;18(2):280-287. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1127-y. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.双颌正颌手术后骨骼Ⅲ类错合伴前牙开牙合的复发情况,取决于上颌后份垂直牵引和下颌逆时针旋转
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):e230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.对比下颌前突患者行单侧和双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨术后髁突形态变化和位置稳定性。
Head Face Med. 2019 Jul 11;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0202-z.
6
Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.不同面型Ⅲ类患者采用最小限度正畸下颌后缩术后稳定性的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
7
Comparison of mandibular stability after SSRO with surgery-first approach versus conventional ortho-first approach.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(1):50-5. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1071262. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Evaluation of treatment modality for skeletal Class III malocclusion with labioversed upper incisors and/or protrusive maxilla: surgical movement and stability of rotational maxillary setback procedure.伴有唇倾上切牙和/或上颌前突的骨性III类错牙合治疗方式的评估:上颌旋转后退术的手术移动及稳定性
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Nov;20(6):2049-54. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181be87ba.
9
Comparison of Postoperative Stability Between BSSRO and Le Fort 1 Osteotomy with BSSRO in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Severe Open Bite.严重开颌的Ⅲ类错颌畸形患者中,双颌矢状劈开截骨术(BSSRO)与Le Fort 1截骨联合BSSRO术后稳定性的比较
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):591-595. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01300-2. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
10
Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.改良口内垂直升支截骨术矫治下颌前突后的骨骼变化
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery-early approach combined with condylectomy for correction of severe facial asymmetry with mandibular condylar hyperplasia: a case report.手术-早期入路联合髁突切除术矫正下颌髁突增生所致严重面部不对称:1例病例报告
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Aug 31;50(4):227-234. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.4.227.
2
Reverse Engineering Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontics in Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Case Report.唇腭裂患者正颌外科手术与正畸治疗的逆向工程:病例报告
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;11(8):771. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080771.
3
The Skeletal Stability of Combined Surgery First Approach and Clear Aligners in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Correction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.与采用手术优先方法治疗骨性III类错牙合畸形中正颌手术稳定性相关的骨骼和牙齿变量。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 May;71(5):e215-23. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.12.025. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: postoperative rapid orthodontic tooth movement.手术优先加速正颌外科手术:术后快速正畸牙齿移动
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):781-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.035.
3
Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery.
联合手术优先方法与隐形矫治器治疗骨性III类错牙合畸形的骨骼稳定性:一项随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 2;13(3):872. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030872.
4
Comparison of 3-dimensional postoperative dental movement in Class III surgical correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.比较伴有和不伴有术前正畸治疗的 III 类手术矫正的三维术后牙齿移动。
Biomed J. 2021 Dec;44(6 Suppl 2):S282-S295. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
5
Surgery First Approach in Orthognathic Surgery - Considerations and Clinical Case Report.正颌外科手术的优先手术入路——考量因素与临床病例报告
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jul-Dec;11(2):349-351. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_8_21. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Skeletal Stability after Mandibular Setback via Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Verse Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.经矢状劈开下颌支截骨术与口内垂直下颌支截骨术后退下颌后骨骼稳定性:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 26;10(21):4950. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214950.
7
Surgery-first approach reduces the overall treatment time without damaging long-term stability in the skeletal class III correction: a preliminary study.手术优先方法可缩短总体治疗时间,且不损害骨性III类错牙合矫治的长期稳定性:一项初步研究。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 17;43(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40902-021-00304-8.
8
Comparative stability and outcomes of two surgical approaches for correction of class III asymmetry with lip or occlusal cant.比较唇倾或牙合倾的 III 类不对称畸形两种手术方法的稳定性和结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Sep;25(9):5449-5462. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03853-4. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
9
Facial asymmetry correction: From conventional orthognathic treatment to surgery-first approach.面部不对称矫正:从传统正颌治疗到手术优先 approach。 (这里“approach”直译为“方法”,但结合语境可能有更专业的表述,比如“术式”等,可根据具体医学领域进一步优化)
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):311-320. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.047.
10
Rationale, Relevance, and Efficacy of "Surgery First, Orthodontics Later" Approach in the Management of Cases of Severe Malocclusion with Skeletal Discrepancy.“先手术,后正畸”方法在治疗伴有骨骼差异的严重错牙合畸形病例中的基本原理、相关性及疗效
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):57-71. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_272_18.
手术优先加速正颌外科手术:模型手术的正畸指导方针与设置
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;69(3):771-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
4
A Surgery-first approach in surgical-orthodontic treatment of mandibular prognathism--a case report.下颌前突外科正畸治疗中优先手术的方法——病例报告
Chang Gung Med J. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(6):699-705.
5
Expedited correction of significant dentofacial asymmetry using a "surgery first" approach.采用“手术优先”方法快速矫正明显的牙颌面不对称。
J Clin Orthod. 2010 Feb;44(2):97-103; quiz 105.
6
Surgery-first approach in skeletal class III malocclusion treated with 2-jaw surgery: evaluation of surgical movement and postoperative orthodontic treatment.双颌手术治疗骨性Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的外科优先治疗方法:手术移动及术后正畸治疗的评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Mar;21(2):332-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fd4.
7
"Surgery first" skeletal Class III correction using the Skeletal Anchorage System.使用骨锚系统的“手术优先”骨性III类错颌矫治
J Clin Orthod. 2009 Feb;43(2):97-105.
8
Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis.面部关系的变异;它们在治疗和预后中的意义。
Am J Orthod. 1948 Oct;34(10):812-40. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3.
9
Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery.患者及临床医生所感知到的正颌手术需求。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):697-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.022.
10
Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term results.双侧矢状劈开截骨术矫正下颌前突:长期疗效
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1584-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.031.