Suppr超能文献

严重开颌的Ⅲ类错颌畸形患者中,双颌矢状劈开截骨术(BSSRO)与Le Fort 1截骨联合BSSRO术后稳定性的比较

Comparison of Postoperative Stability Between BSSRO and Le Fort 1 Osteotomy with BSSRO in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Severe Open Bite.

作者信息

Ooi Kazuhiro, Inoue Nobuo, Matsushita Kazuhiro, Yamaguchi Hiro-O, Mikoya Tadashi, Kawashiri Shuichi, Tei Kanchu

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral Patho-biological Science, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 13 Nishi 7 Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8586 Japan.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641 Japan.

出版信息

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):591-595. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01300-2. Epub 2019 Oct 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate postoperative stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with severe open bite by comparison between bilateral sagittal splitting osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO with Le Fort 1 osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with severe open bite who were needed more than 6 degree counterclockwise rotation of distal segment by only BSSRO in preoperative cephalometric prediction. The subjects were divided into group A, where 9 patients were treated by BSSRO, and group B, where 8 patients were treated by BSSRO with Le Fort 1 osteotomy. Patient's characteristics of age, gender, preoperative over jet (OJ) and over bite (OB) were not found to be significantly different between the two groups. Counterclockwise rotation of distal segment in preoperative cephalometric prediction by only BSSRO was not found to be significantly different between group A of 7.6 (6-10.6) degree and group B of 9 (6-13) degree. The amount of rotation was reduced to 5.4 (3-10) degree by bimaxillary surgery using BSSRO and Le Fort 1 osteotomy in group B. OJ and OB were measured as occlusal stability factor. Distance between ANS-to-PNS plane and the edge of upper incisor (NF-U1Ed), and distance between Menton and edge of lower incisor (Me-L1Ed) were measured as skeletal stability factor using cephalometric analysis. These lengths were measured at pre-surgery (T0), 2 weeks after surgery (T1) and 1 year after surgery (T2), and these differences between the two groups were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

OJ and OB kept a good relation at any experimental periods. The change of Me-L1Ed was significantly larger in group A (1.21 mm at T0-T1, 1.02 mm at T0-T2) than in group B (0.14 mm at T0-T1, 0.16 mm at T0-T2). The change of NF-U1Ed was not significantly different between group A (1.07 mm at T0-T1, 0.57 mm at T0-T2) and group B (0.51 mm at T0-T1, - 0.05 mm at T0-T2).

CONCLUSION

In case with more than 6 degree counterclockwise rotation of distal segment, skeletal stability was better after bimaxillary surgery than only BSSRO; however, OJ and OB kept a good relation.

摘要

引言

我们旨在通过比较双侧矢状劈开截骨术(BSSRO)和BSSRO联合Le Fort 1截骨术,研究严重开牙合的III类骨性错牙合患者正颌手术后的稳定性。

材料与方法

17例严重开牙合的III类骨性错牙合患者,术前头影测量预测仅行BSSRO时远心骨段需逆时针旋转超过6度。将受试者分为A组,9例患者接受BSSRO治疗;B组,8例患者接受BSSRO联合Le Fort 1截骨术治疗。发现两组患者的年龄、性别、术前覆盖(OJ)和覆牙合(OB)特征无显著差异。仅行BSSRO时,A组术前头影测量预测远心骨段逆时针旋转7.6(6 - 10.6)度,B组为9(6 - 13)度,两组间无显著差异。B组采用BSSRO联合Le Fort 1截骨术的双颌手术使旋转量降至5.4(3 - 10)度。测量OJ和OB作为咬合稳定性因素。采用头影测量分析,测量前鼻棘至后鼻棘平面与上切牙边缘之间的距离(NF - U1Ed)以及颏点与下切牙边缘之间的距离(Me - L1Ed)作为骨骼稳定性因素。这些长度在术前(T0)、术后2周(T1)和术后1年(T2)进行测量,并对两组间的差异进行统计学分析。

结果

在任何实验阶段,OJ和OB均保持良好关系。A组Me - L1Ed的变化(T0 - T1为1.21mm,T0 - T2为1.02mm)显著大于B组(T0 - T1为0.14mm,T0 - T2为0.16mm)。A组NF - U1Ed的变化(T0 - T1为1.07mm,T0 - T2为0.57mm)与B组(T0 - T1为0.51mm,T0 - T2为 - 0.05mm)无显著差异。

结论

对于远心骨段逆时针旋转超过6度的情况,双颌手术后的骨骼稳定性优于单纯BSSRO;然而,OJ和OB保持良好关系。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery.下颌后缩术后稳定性:单纯下颌手术与双颌手术对比
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;70(7):e408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
5
Long-term stability of surgical-orthodontic open-bite correction.外科-正畸开颌矫正的长期稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Sep;138(3):254.e1-254.e10; discussion 254-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.021.
9
Evaluation of anterior open-bite treatment with occlusal adjustment.咬合调整治疗前牙开牙合的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jul;134(1):10-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验