Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4102-4110. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5457-5. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
In a preliminary experience, we claimed the potential value of 3D printing technology for pre-operative counseling and surgical planning. However, no objective analysis has ever assessed its additional benefit in transferring anatomical information from radiology to final users. We decided to validate the pre-operative use of 3D-printed anatomical models in patients with solid organs' diseases as a new tool to deliver morphological information.
Fifteen patients scheduled for laparoscopic splenectomy, nephrectomy, or pancreatectomy were selected and, for each, a full-size 3D virtual anatomical object was reconstructed from a contrast-enhanced MDCT (Multiple Detector Computed Tomography) and then prototyped using a 3D printer. After having carefully evaluated-in a random sequence-conventional contrast MDCT scans, virtual 3D reconstructions on a flat monitor, and 3D-printed models of the same anatomy for each selected case, thirty subjects with different expertise in radiological imaging (10 medical students, 10 surgeons and 10 radiologists) were administered a multiple-item questionnaire. Crucial issues for the anatomical understanding and the pre-operative planning of the scheduled procedure were addressed.
The visual and tactile inspection of 3D models allowed the best anatomical understanding, with faster and clearer comprehension of the surgical anatomy. As expected, less experienced medical students perceived the highest benefit (53.9% ± 4.14 of correct answers with 3D-printed models, compared to 53.4 % ± 4.6 with virtual models and 45.5% ± 4.6 with MDCT), followed by surgeons and radiologists. The average time spent by participants in 3D model assessing was shorter (60.67 ± 25.5 s) than the one of the corresponding virtual 3D reconstruction (70.8 ± 28.18 s) or conventional MDCT scan (127.04 ± 35.91 s).
3D-printed models help to transfer complex anatomical information to clinicians, resulting useful in the pre-operative planning, for intra-operative navigation and for surgical training purposes.
在初步经验中,我们声称 3D 打印技术在术前咨询和手术规划方面具有潜在价值。然而,尚无客观分析评估其将放射学解剖信息传递给最终用户的额外益处。我们决定验证 3D 打印解剖模型在实体器官疾病患者中的术前使用,将其作为传递形态信息的新工具。
选择了 15 例计划行腹腔镜脾切除术、肾切除术或胰切除术的患者,为每位患者从增强型 MDCT(多探测器计算机断层扫描)重建全尺寸 3D 虚拟解剖物体,然后使用 3D 打印机对其进行原型制作。在对每位患者的常规增强 MDCT 扫描、平面监视器上的虚拟 3D 重建和同一解剖结构的 3D 打印模型进行仔细评估(随机顺序)后,我们对 30 名具有不同放射影像学专业知识的受试者进行了多项问卷调查。调查内容包括解剖理解和预定手术的术前规划等关键问题。
3D 模型的视觉和触觉检查可获得最佳的解剖理解,使手术解剖的理解更快、更清晰。不出所料,经验较少的医学生认为 3D 打印模型的受益最高(53.9%±4.14 个正确答案,而虚拟模型为 53.4%±4.6,MDCT 为 45.5%±4.6),其次是外科医生和放射科医生。参与者评估 3D 模型的平均时间更短(60.67±25.5 秒),而评估相应的虚拟 3D 重建(70.8±28.18 秒)或常规 MDCT 扫描(127.04±35.91 秒)的时间更长。
3D 打印模型有助于将复杂的解剖信息传递给临床医生,从而有助于术前规划、术中导航和手术培训。