Forman Evan M, Schumacher Leah M, Crosby Ross, Manasse Stephanie M, Goldstein Stephanie P, Butryn Meghan L, Wyckoff Emily P, Graham Thomas J
Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St, Suite 119, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, ND, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):741-753. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9897-x.
Adherence to dietary prescriptions is critical for successful weight loss and weight loss maintenance. However, research on specific instances of inadherence (lapses) is limited, and findings regarding the frequency, nature, and causes of lapses are mixed. Additionally, no studies have examined lapses over the course of a weight loss program.
In the context of a reduced calorie diet prescribed as part of a behavioral treatment, we aimed to characterize lapse occurrence, examine lapse frequency across treatment, examine predictors of lapses, and assess the relationship between lapses and weight loss.
Adults (n = 189) enrolled in a 12-month behavioral weight loss program completed ecological momentary assessment (EMA) at baseline, mid-treatment, and end of treatment. At each EMA survey, participants indicated whether a lapse had occurred, and responded to questions assessing situational, environmental, and affective states.
Lapse frequency showed a curvilinear relationship over time, such that frequency first decreased and then increased. Lapse frequency at baseline was negatively associated with early and overall weight loss. Lapses most often occurred at home, in the evenings, on the weekends, and entailed eating a forbidden food. Greater overall levels of assessed affective and environmental triggers predicted lapses, and greater momentary hunger and deprivation, and the presence of palatable food, also prospectively predicted lapses.
In addition to characterizing lapse frequency, the current study identified prospective predictors of lapses across treatment. These findings support the importance of lapses to weight control and provide insight for potential targets of intervention to prevent lapse occurrence.
坚持饮食规定对于成功减肥和维持体重至关重要。然而,关于不坚持(失误)的具体情况的研究有限,并且关于失误的频率、性质和原因的研究结果参差不齐。此外,尚无研究考察减肥计划过程中的失误情况。
在作为行为治疗一部分规定的低热量饮食背景下,我们旨在描述失误的发生情况,检查整个治疗过程中的失误频率,检查失误的预测因素,并评估失误与体重减轻之间的关系。
参加为期12个月行为减肥计划的成年人(n = 189)在基线、治疗中期和治疗结束时完成了生态瞬时评估(EMA)。在每次EMA调查中,参与者表明是否发生了失误,并回答了评估情境、环境和情感状态的问题。
失误频率随时间呈曲线关系,即频率先下降后上升。基线时的失误频率与早期和总体体重减轻呈负相关。失误最常发生在家里、晚上、周末,并且涉及食用禁食。评估的情感和环境触发因素的总体水平越高,预测失误的可能性越大,瞬间饥饿和匮乏感越强,以及有美味食物的情况下,也能前瞻性地预测失误。
除了描述失误频率外,本研究还确定了整个治疗过程中失误的前瞻性预测因素。这些发现支持了失误对体重控制的重要性,并为预防失误发生的潜在干预目标提供了见解。