McKenzie Scott C, Dunster Kimble, Chan Wandy, Brown Martin R, Platts David G, Javorsky George, Anstey Chris, Gregory Shaun D
Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Apr;32(2):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0010-6. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Cardiac output (CO) is commonly measured using the thermodilution technique at the time of right heart catheterisation (RHC). However inter-operator variability, and the operator characteristics which may influence that, has not been quantified. Therefore, this study aimed to assess inter-operator variability with the thermodilution technique using a mock circulation loop (MCL) with calibrated flow sensors. Participants were blinded and asked to determine 4 levels of CO using the thermodilution technique, which was compared with the MCL calibrated flow sensors. The MCL was used to randomly generate CO between 3.0 and 7.0 L/min through changes in heart rate, contractility and vascular resistance with a RHC inserted through the MCL pulmonary artery. Participant characteristics including gender, specialty, age, height, weight, body-mass index, grip strength and RHC experience were recorded and compared to determine their relationship with CO measurement accuracy. In total, there were 15 participants, made up of consultant cardiologists (6), advanced trainees in cardiology (5) and intensive care consultants (4). The majority (9) had performed 26-100 previous RHCs, while 4 had performed more than 100 RHCs. Compared to the MCL-measured CO, participants overestimated CO using the thermodilution technique with a mean difference of +0.75 ± 0.71 L/min. The overall r value for actual vs measured CO was 0.85. The difference between MCL and thermodilution derived CO declined significantly with increasing RHC experience (P < 0.001), increasing body mass index (P < 0.001) and decreasing grip strength (P = 0.033). This study demonstrated that the thermodilution technique is a reasonable method to determine CO, and that operator experience was the only participant characteristic related to CO measurement accuracy. Our results suggest that adequate exposure to, and training in, the thermodilution technique is required for clinicians who perform RHC.
心输出量(CO)通常在右心导管插入术(RHC)时采用热稀释技术进行测量。然而,不同操作人员之间的变异性以及可能影响该变异性的操作人员特征尚未得到量化。因此,本研究旨在使用带有校准流量传感器的模拟循环回路(MCL)评估热稀释技术的操作人员间变异性。研究对象被设盲,并被要求使用热稀释技术确定4个心输出量水平,然后将其与MCL校准流量传感器的数据进行比较。通过改变心率、心肌收缩力和血管阻力,MCL用于在3.0至7.0升/分钟之间随机生成心输出量,同时将一根右心导管插入MCL肺动脉。记录研究对象的特征,包括性别、专业、年龄、身高、体重、体重指数、握力和右心导管插入术经验,并进行比较,以确定它们与心输出量测量准确性的关系。总共有15名研究对象,包括心内科顾问医生(6名)、心内科高级受训人员(5名)和重症监护顾问医生(4名)。大多数人(9名)之前进行过26 - 100次右心导管插入术,而4人进行过100次以上右心导管插入术。与MCL测量的心输出量相比,研究对象使用热稀释技术高估了心输出量,平均差值为+0.75±0.7升/分钟。实际心输出量与测量的心输出量之间的总体r值为0.85。随着右心导管插入术经验的增加(P < 0.001)、体重指数的增加(P < 0.001)和握力的降低(P = 0.033),MCL与热稀释法得出的心输出量之间的差异显著减小。本研究表明,热稀释技术是确定心输出量的一种合理方法,并且操作人员经验是与心输出量测量准确性相关的唯一研究对象特征。我们的结果表明,进行右心导管插入术的临床医生需要充分接触并接受热稀释技术的培训。