Lawson Andrew A, Tannous Paul, Laternser Christina, Migally Karl
Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E. Chicago Ave, Box 21, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Mar;46(3):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03491-z. Epub 2024 May 18.
Cardiac index (CI) may be derived from the Fick method, using measured or estimated oxygen consumption (VO), or from thermodilution. In children, LaFarge VO estimates correlate poorly with measured VO values. In a large adult cohort, there was only modest correlation between estimated Fick CI (eFick CI) and thermodilution CI (TDCI). We evaluated the extent of agreement between eFick CI using LaFarge estimates of VO and TDCI in a pediatric cohort. A retrospective, single-center chart review of patients 3-18 years of age who underwent cardiac catheterization with documented eFick CI and TDCI from 2004 to 2020 included 201 catheterizations from 161 unique patients. The mean patient age at catheterization was 12.2y (SD 4.4y). The most frequent diagnosis was cardiomyopathy, followed by congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. TDCI and eFick CI differed by > 20% in 49% of catheterizations. eFick CI systematically exceeded TDCI by a mean percentage difference of 24% (SD 31%). Higher mean CI ((eFick CI + TDCI)/2) and older age were predictive of greater percent difference between eFick CI and TDCI. For each increase in mean CI by 1.0 L/min/m, the expected percent difference in CI increased by 9.9% (p < 0.001). In pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, eFick CI with LaFarge VO systematically exceeds TDCI. The difference between methods is frequently > 20%, which may have clinically significant implications. Discrepancies between eFick CI and TDCI increase at higher mean CI.
心脏指数(CI)可以通过Fick法得出,使用测量的或估计的氧耗量(VO),也可以通过热稀释法得出。在儿童中,LaFarge的VO估计值与测量的VO值相关性较差。在一个大型成人队列中,估计的Fick CI(eFick CI)与热稀释CI(TDCI)之间只有适度的相关性。我们评估了在儿科队列中使用LaFarge的VO估计值的eFick CI与TDCI之间的一致性程度。对2004年至2020年期间接受心脏导管插入术且记录了eFick CI和TDCI的3至18岁患者进行的一项回顾性、单中心图表审查,包括来自161名独特患者的201次导管插入术。导管插入时的平均患者年龄为12.2岁(标准差4.4岁)。最常见的诊断是心肌病,其次是先天性心脏病和肺动脉高压。在49%的导管插入术中,TDCI和eFick CI相差超过20%。eFick CI系统性地超过TDCI,平均百分比差异为24%(标准差31%)。较高的平均CI((eFick CI + TDCI)/2)和年龄较大可预测eFick CI与TDCI之间的差异百分比更大。平均CI每增加1.0 L/min/m²,CI的预期差异百分比增加9.9%(p < 0.001)。在接受心脏导管插入术的儿科患者中,使用LaFarge的VO的eFick CI系统性地超过TDCI。两种方法之间的差异经常超过20%,这可能具有临床重要意义。eFick CI与TDCI之间的差异在平均CI较高时会增加。