Diaz Keith M, Krupka David J, Chang Melinda J, Kronish Ian M, Moise Natalie, Goldsmith Jeff, Schwartz Joseph E
a Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Department of Medicine , Columbia University Medical Center , New York , NY , USA.
b Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health , Columbia University , New York , NY , USA.
J Sports Sci. 2018 Jan;36(2):206-212. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1293279. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
Wrist-based accelerometers are increasingly used to assess physical activity (PA) in population-based studies; however, cut-points to translate wrist-based accelerometer counts into PA intensity categories are still needed. The purpose of this study was to determine wrist-based cut-points for moderate- and vigorous-intensity ambulatory PA in adults for the Actical accelerometer. Healthy adults (n = 24) completed a four-phase treadmill exercise protocol (1.9, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.2 mph) while wearing an Actical accelerometer on their wrist. Metabolic equivalent of task (MET) levels were assessed by indirect calorimetry. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to determine accelerometer counts that maximised sensitivity and specificity for classification of moderate (≥3 METs) and vigorous (>6 METs) ambulatory activity. The area under the ROC curves to discriminate moderate- and vigorous-intensity ambulatory activity were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-0.97; P < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99; P < 0.001), respectively. The identified cut-point for moderate-intensity ambulatory activity was 1031 counts per minute, which had a corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 85.6% and 87.5%, respectively. The identified cut-point for vigorous intensity ambulatory activity was 3589 counts per minute, which had a corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 88.0% and 98.7%, respectively. This study established intensity-specific cut-points for wrist-based wear of the Actical accelerometer which are recommended for quantification of moderate- and vigorous-intensity ambulatory activity.
在基于人群的研究中,腕部加速度计越来越多地用于评估身体活动(PA);然而,仍需要将腕部加速度计计数转化为PA强度类别的切点。本研究的目的是确定Actical加速度计在成年人中用于中强度和高强度动态PA的腕部切点。24名健康成年人在手腕上佩戴Actical加速度计,完成了一个四阶段的跑步机运动方案(速度分别为1.9、3.0、4.0和5.2英里/小时)。通过间接量热法评估任务代谢当量(MET)水平。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以确定能使中强度(≥3 METs)和高强度(>6 METs)动态活动分类的敏感性和特异性最大化的加速度计计数。区分中强度和高强度动态活动的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.93(95%置信区间[CI]:0.90 - 0.97;P < 0.001)和0.96(95%CI:0.94 - 0.99;P < 0.001)。确定的中强度动态活动切点为每分钟1031次计数,其相应的敏感性和特异性分别为85.6%和87.5%。确定的高强度动态活动切点为每分钟3589次计数,其相应的敏感性和特异性分别为88.0%和98.7%。本研究确定了Actical加速度计腕部佩戴时特定强度的切点,推荐用于量化中强度和高强度动态活动。