Alothman Sahar J, Wang Weisheng, Goerlitz David S, Islam Md, Zhong Xiaogang, Kishore Archana, Azhar Redha I, Kallakury Bhaskar V, Furth Priscilla A
Graduate School of Arts and Science, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2017 Apr;10(4):244-254. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0268. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
An intervention study initiated at age 4 months compared the impact of tamoxifen (25 mg), raloxifene (22.5 mg), and letrozole (2.5 mg) administered by 60-day release subcutaneous pellet on mammary preneoplasia prevalence at age 6 months in conditional genetically engineered mouse models with different Breast cancer 1 () gene dosages targeted to mammary epithelial cells and germline Tumor protein P53 () haploinsufficiency (10-16/cohort). The proportion of unexposed control mice demonstrating mammary preneoplasia at age 6 months was highest in (54%) mice followed by mice (30%). By age 12 months, invasive mammary cancers appeared in 80% of and 42% of control unexposed mice. The spectrum of cancer histology was similar in both models without somatic mutation of the nongenetically engineered , or Death-associated protein kinase 3 () alleles. Two-month exposure to tamoxifen, raloxifene, and letrozole significantly reduced estrogen-mediated tertiary branching by 65%, 71%, and 78%, respectively, in mice at age 6 months. However, only letrozole significantly reduced hyperplastic alveolar nodules (HAN) prevalence (by 52%) and number (by 30%) and invasive cancer appeared despite tamoxifen exposure. In contrast, tamoxifen significantly reduced HAN number by 95% in mice. Control mice with varying combinations of the different genetically modified alleles and transgene demonstrated that the combination of insufficiency and haploinsufficiency was required for appearance of preneoplasia and no individual genetic alteration confounded the response to tamoxifen. In summary, although specific antihormonal approaches showed effectiveness, with gene dosage implicated as a possible modifying variable, more effective chemopreventive approaches for mutation-induced cancer may require alternative and/or additional agents. .
一项在4个月大时启动的干预研究,比较了他莫昔芬(25毫克)、雷洛昔芬(22.5毫克)和来曲唑(2.5毫克)通过60天缓释皮下植入丸给药,对不同乳腺癌1()基因剂量靶向乳腺上皮细胞且种系肿瘤蛋白P53()单倍体不足的条件性基因工程小鼠模型在6个月大时乳腺肿瘤前期患病率的影响(每组10 - 16只)。6个月大时,未暴露的对照小鼠出现乳腺肿瘤前期的比例在(54%)小鼠中最高,其次是小鼠(30%)。到12个月大时,80%的和42%未暴露的对照小鼠出现了浸润性乳腺癌。在两个模型中,癌症组织学谱相似,均未发生非基因工程的或死亡相关蛋白激酶3()等位基因的体细胞突变。在6个月大的小鼠中,为期两个月的他莫昔芬、雷洛昔芬和来曲唑暴露分别使雌激素介导的三级分支显著减少了65%、71%和78%。然而,只有来曲唑显著降低了增生性肺泡结节(HAN)的患病率(降低了52%)和数量(降低了30%),且尽管暴露于他莫昔芬,仍出现了浸润性癌症。相比之下,他莫昔芬使小鼠的HAN数量显著减少了95%。具有不同转基因等位基因和转基因不同组合的对照小鼠表明,肿瘤前期的出现需要不足和单倍体不足的组合,且没有个体基因改变混淆对他莫昔芬的反应。总之,尽管特定的抗激素方法显示出有效性,基因剂量可能是一个潜在的修饰变量,但针对突变诱导癌症的更有效的化学预防方法可能需要替代和/或额外的药物。