Iragnes Frédérique
École nationale de la magistrature, 10, rue des Frères-Bonie, 33080 Bordeaux cedex, France; Institut psycho-judiciaire, centre hospitalier de Cadillac, 89, rue Cazeaux-Cazalet, 33410 Cadillac-sur-Garonne, France.
Soins Psychiatr. 2017 Mar-Apr;38(309):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2017.01.004.
Faced with the increase in convictions for sex offences, legislators in the 1990s studied the possibility of monitoring these criminals and offenders, considered to be among the most dangerous, following their imprisonment. This resulted in the law of 17th June 1998, establishing socio-judicial supervision. Inspired by several high-profile cases, the resulting changes to the legislation have reinforced judicial measures aimed at preventing repeat offending with regard to the most serious crimes. Socio-judicial supervision in particular is routinely ordered as part of certain safety measures while court-ordered therapy has become a cornerstone in the management of the most dangerous prisoners. An analysis of the connection between the judge and court-ordered therapy enables its role to be better understood.
面对性犯罪定罪数量的增加，20世纪90年代的立法者研究了在这些被认为是最危险的罪犯入狱后对其进行监控的可能性。这促成了1998年6月17日的法律，确立了社会司法监督。受几起备受瞩目的案件启发，立法的相应变化加强了旨在防止最严重犯罪再次发生的司法措施。特别是，社会司法监督作为某些安全措施的一部分经常被下令实施，而法院下令的治疗已成为管理最危险囚犯的基石。对法官与法院下令的治疗之间联系的分析有助于更好地理解其作用。
