Liberman Zoe, Shaw Alex
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Resource sharing is an important aspect of human society, and how resources are distributed can provide people with crucial information about social structure. Indeed, a recent partiality account of resource distribution suggested that people may use unequal partial resource distributions to make inferences about a distributor's social affiliations. To empirically test this suggestion derived from the theoretical argument of the partiality account, we presented 4- to 9-year-old children with distributors who gave out resources unequally using either a partial procedure (intentionally choosing which recipient would get more) or an impartial procedure (rolling a die to determine which recipient would get more) and asked children to make judgments about whom the distributor was better friends with. At each age tested, children expected a distributor who gave partially to be better friends with the favored recipient (Studies 1-3). Interestingly, younger children (4- to 6-year-olds) inferred friendship between the distributor and the favored recipient even in cases where the distributor used an impartial procedure, whereas older children (7- to 9-year-olds) did not infer friendship based on impartial distributions (Study 1). These studies demonstrate that children use third-party resource distributions to make important predictions about the social world and add to our knowledge about the developmental trajectory of understanding the importance of partiality in addition to inequity when making social inferences.
资源共享是人类社会的一个重要方面,资源的分配方式能够为人们提供有关社会结构的关键信息。事实上,最近一项关于资源分配的偏好性研究表明,人们可能会利用不平等的部分资源分配来推断分配者的社会关系。为了通过实证检验从偏好性理论中得出的这一观点,我们向4至9岁的儿童展示了以部分程序(故意选择哪个接受者会得到更多)或公平程序(掷骰子决定哪个接受者会得到更多)不平等地分配资源的分配者,并要求儿童判断分配者与谁是更好的朋友。在每个测试年龄,儿童都期望采用部分分配方式的分配者与受青睐的接受者是更好的朋友(研究1 - 3)。有趣的是,年幼的儿童(4至6岁)即使在分配者使用公平程序的情况下,也会推断分配者与受青睐的接受者之间存在友谊,而年龄较大的儿童(7至9岁)不会基于公平分配来推断友谊(研究1)。这些研究表明,儿童利用第三方资源分配对社会世界做出重要预测,并增加了我们对儿童在进行社会推理时理解偏好性(除不平等之外)重要性的发展轨迹的认识。