Suppr超能文献

患者对药房星级评定模型的看法。

Patient perceptions of a pharmacy star rating model.

作者信息

Warholak Terri L, Patel Mira, Rosenthal Meagen, West-Strum Donna, Ettienne Earl B, Nunlee-Bland Gail, Nau David, Hincapie Ana L

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify patients' understanding of what constitutes a "quality pharmacy" and to obtain their feedback regarding the development and use of the pharmacy star rating model, a pharmacy-specific aggregate performance score based on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Medicare Star Rating.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Focus groups were conducted in Arizona, California, Mississippi, Maryland, and the District of Columbia, and one-on-one interviews were conducted in Indiana. Eligible patients were required to routinely use a community pharmacy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consumer insights on their experiences with their pharmacies and their input on the pharmacy star rating model were attained. Key themes from the focus groups and interviews were obtained through the use of qualitative data analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-nine subjects from 5 states and DC participated in 6 focus groups and 4 one-on-one interviews. Eighty-eight percent of participants reported currently taking at least 1 medication, and 87% reported having at least 1 health condition. The 7 themes identified during qualitative analysis included patient care, relational factors for choosing a pharmacy, physical factors for choosing a pharmacy, factors related to use of the pharmacy star rating model, reliability of the pharmacy star rating model, trust in pharmacists, and measures of pharmacy quality. Most participants agreed that the ratings would be useful and could aid in selecting a pharmacy, especially if they were moving to a new place or if they were dissatisfied with their current pharmacy.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacy quality measures are new to patients. Therefore, training and education will need to be provided to patients, as pharmacies begin to offer additional clinical services, such as medication therapy management and diabetes education. The use of the pharmacy star rating model was dependent on the participants' situation when choosing a pharmacy.

摘要

目的

确定患者对“优质药房”构成要素的理解,并获取他们对药房星级评定模型(一种基于医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医疗保险星级评定的特定药房综合绩效得分)的开发和使用的反馈。

设计

前瞻性横断面研究。

设置与参与者

在亚利桑那州、加利福尼亚州、密西西比州、马里兰州和哥伦比亚特区进行了焦点小组访谈,并在印第安纳州进行了一对一访谈。符合条件的患者需经常使用社区药房。

主要观察指标

获得消费者对其药房体验的见解以及他们对药房星级评定模型的意见。通过定性数据分析得出焦点小组和访谈中的关键主题。

结果

来自5个州和哥伦比亚特区的49名受试者参加了6个焦点小组和4次一对一访谈。88%的参与者报告目前至少服用1种药物,87%的参与者报告至少有一种健康状况。定性分析中确定的7个主题包括患者护理、选择药房的关系因素、选择药房的物理因素、与药房星级评定模型使用相关的因素、药房星级评定模型的可靠性、对药剂师的信任以及药房质量衡量标准。大多数参与者认为这些评级会很有用,有助于选择药房,特别是当他们搬到新地方或对当前药房不满意时。

结论

药房质量衡量标准对患者来说是新事物。因此,随着药房开始提供额外的临床服务,如药物治疗管理和糖尿病教育,需要对患者进行培训和教育。药房星级评定模型的使用取决于参与者选择药房时的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验