Jiang Silis Y, Murphy Alexandrea, Heitkemper Elizabeth M, Hum R Stanley, Kaufman David R, Mamykina Lena
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, United States.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, United States.
J Biomed Inform. 2017 May;69:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
To examine the impact of the implementation of an electronic handoff tool (the Handoff Tool) on shared mental models (SMM) within patient care teams as measured by content overlap and discrepancies in verbal handoff presentations given by different clinicians caring for the same patient.
Researchers observed, recorded, and transcribed verbal handoffs given by different members of patient care teams in a pediatric intensive care unit. The transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed for content overlap scores and the number of discrepancies in handoffs of different team members before and after the implementation of the tool.
Content overlap scores did not change post-implementation. The average number of discrepancies nearly doubled following the implementation (from 0.76 discrepancies per handoff group pre-implementation to 1.17 discrepancies per handoff group post-implementation); however, this change was not statistically significant (p=0.37). Discrepancies classified as related to dosage of treatment or procedure and to patients' symptoms increased in frequency post-implementation.
The results suggest that the Handoff Tool did not have the desired positive impact on SMM within patient care teams. Future electronic tools for facilitating team handoff may need longer implementation times, complementary changes to handoff process and structure, and improved designs that integrate a common core of shared information with discipline-specific records.
While electronic handoff tools provide great opportunities to improve communication and facilitate the formation of shared mental models within patient care teams, further work is necessary to realize their full potential.
通过衡量同一患者的不同临床医生在口头交接班陈述中的内容重叠和差异,来检验实施电子交接班工具(交接班工具)对患者护理团队内共享心智模型(SMM)的影响。
研究人员观察、记录并转录了儿科重症监护病房患者护理团队不同成员的口头交接班内容。在工具实施前后,对转录内容进行定性编码,并分析内容重叠分数以及不同团队成员交接班中的差异数量。
实施后内容重叠分数没有变化。实施后差异的平均数量几乎翻倍(从实施前每个交接班组0.76个差异增加到实施后每个交接班组1.17个差异);然而,这一变化没有统计学意义(p = 0.37)。实施后,归类为与治疗或程序剂量以及患者症状相关的差异频率增加。
结果表明,交接班工具对患者护理团队内的共享心智模型没有产生预期的积极影响。未来用于促进团队交接班的电子工具可能需要更长的实施时间、对交接班流程和结构进行互补性改变,以及改进设计,将共享信息的共同核心与特定学科记录整合起来。
虽然电子交接班工具为改善沟通和促进患者护理团队内共享心智模型的形成提供了巨大机会,但要充分发挥其潜力还需要进一步努力。