Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centered Care, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;15(10):1565-1571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.02.032. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Coping resources and processes are altered in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We investigated the relationship between coping resources and gastrointestinal (GI) and extraintestinal symptom severity in patients with IBS and potential mediators of this relationship.
We performed a cross-sectional study of 216 patients with IBS attending a secondary/tertiary care specialized outpatient center in Sweden from 2003 through 2007. We collected data on coping resources, levels of anxiety (general and GI specific), depressive symptoms, levels of GI symptoms, and extraintestinal somatic symptoms (somatization) by administering validated self-report questionnaires. General Linear Models were used to assess associations and mediation.
GI symptoms: low levels of physical coping resources (practice of activities that are beneficial for health; P = .0016), high levels of general anxiety symptoms (P = .033), and GI-specific anxiety symptoms (P < .0001), but not depressive symptoms (P = .89), were independently associated with GI symptom levels (R = 0.31). Anxiety and GI-specific anxiety partially mediated the effect of physical coping. Somatization: low levels of physical coping resources (P = .003), high levels of anxiety (P = .0147), depressive (P = .0005), and GI-specific anxiety symptoms (P = .06) were associated with somatization levels (R = 0.35). Levels of general and GI-specific anxiety and depressive symptoms partially mediated this physical coping effect. The effect of psychological coping resources (including optimism, social support, and accepting/expressing emotions) on somatization levels was not significant (P = .98), but was fully mediated by levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, and partially by levels of GI-specific anxiety symptoms.
In a cross-sectional study of patients with IBS in Sweden, we found associations of levels of coping resources with GI and extraintestinal symptom severity; these associations were mediated by levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Although confirmation in longitudinal studies is needed, this identifies coping as a potential psychological treatment target in IBS.
应对资源和应对过程在肠易激综合征(IBS)患者中发生改变。我们研究了 IBS 患者的应对资源与胃肠道(GI)和肠外症状严重程度之间的关系,以及这种关系的潜在中介因素。
我们于 2003 年至 2007 年在瑞典的一家二级/三级专科门诊中心对 216 例 IBS 患者进行了横断面研究。我们通过发放经过验证的自我报告问卷收集了应对资源、焦虑水平(一般和 GI 特定)、抑郁症状、GI 症状和肠外躯体症状(躯体化)的数据。使用一般线性模型评估相关性和中介作用。
GI 症状:低水平的身体应对资源(进行有益于健康的活动;P =.0016)、高水平的一般焦虑症状(P =.033)和 GI 特异性焦虑症状(P <.0001),但抑郁症状水平不高(P =.89),与 GI 症状水平独立相关(R = 0.31)。焦虑和 GI 特异性焦虑部分中介了身体应对的作用。躯体化:低水平的身体应对资源(P =.003)、高水平的焦虑(P =.0147)、抑郁(P =.0005)和 GI 特异性焦虑症状(P =.06)与躯体化水平相关(R = 0.35)。一般和 GI 特异性焦虑和抑郁症状水平部分中介了这种身体应对的影响。心理应对资源(包括乐观、社会支持和接受/表达情感)对躯体化水平的影响不显著(P =.98),但完全由焦虑和抑郁症状水平以及部分由 GI 特异性焦虑症状水平中介。
在瑞典对 IBS 患者进行的横断面研究中,我们发现应对资源水平与 GI 和肠外症状严重程度相关;这些相关性由焦虑和抑郁症状水平介导。尽管需要在纵向研究中加以证实,但这表明应对是 IBS 的一个潜在心理治疗靶点。