• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻关系教育对低满意度和高满意度夫妻的四年效果:一项随机临床试验。

Four year effects of couple relationship education on low and high satisfaction couples: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Queensland.

School of Psychology, Griffith University.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):495-507. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000181. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1037/ccp0000181
PMID:28287797
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Relationship education (RE) usually is conceived of as relationship enhancement for currently satisfied couples, with a goal of helping couples sustain satisfaction. However, RE also might be useful as a brief, indicated intervention for couples with low satisfaction. The current study evaluated the effect of RE on couples with low and high relationship satisfaction.

METHOD

The study was a randomized controlled trial in which 182 couples were randomly assigned to: a book reading control condition (control); RELATE online assessment with feedback and relationship goal setting (RELATE); or RELATE with CoupleCARE (RCC), a flexible delivery skill-based education program. Couples were assessed on relationship satisfaction and individual mental health before and after RE, and through to 4-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Couples with high initial satisfaction showed no effects of RE on satisfaction. RCC but not RELATE increased satisfaction in couples with low initial satisfaction, but effects dissipated between 6 and 12 months after RE. There were no effects of RE on mental health.

CONCLUSION

Flexible delivery RE produces immediate effects as an indicated early intervention for couples with low relationship satisfaction, but the effects attenuate. Future research needs to seek methods to produce better maintained effects. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的

关系教育(RE)通常被视为对目前满意的夫妇进行关系增强,旨在帮助夫妇维持满意度。然而,RE 也可能对满意度较低的夫妇作为一种简短的、有针对性的干预措施有用。本研究评估了 RE 对低满意度和高满意度夫妇的影响。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验,其中 182 对夫妇被随机分配到:阅读书籍对照组(对照);RELATE 在线评估、反馈和关系目标设定(RELATE);或 RELATE 与 CoupleCARE(RCC),一种灵活的基于技能的教育计划。在 RE 之前、之后以及 4 年随访期间,对夫妇的关系满意度和个体心理健康进行评估。

结果

初始满意度高的夫妇,RE 对满意度没有影响。RCC 而非 RELATE 提高了初始满意度低的夫妇的满意度,但在 RE 后 6 至 12 个月时效果减弱。RE 对心理健康没有影响。

结论

灵活的 RE 作为一种针对低关系满意度夫妇的早期干预措施,可以产生即时效果,但效果会减弱。未来的研究需要寻求产生更好维持效果的方法。

相似文献

1
Four year effects of couple relationship education on low and high satisfaction couples: A randomized clinical trial.夫妻关系教育对低满意度和高满意度夫妻的四年效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 May;85(5):495-507. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000181. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
Immediate effect of couple relationship education on low-satisfaction couples: a randomized clinical trial plus an uncontrolled trial replication.夫妻关系教育对低满意度夫妻的即时效果:一项随机临床试验及一项非对照试验复现
Behav Ther. 2015 May;46(3):409-21. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
3
The Effects of a Couples-Based Health Behavior Intervention During Pregnancy on Latino Couples' Dyadic Satisfaction Postpartum.孕期基于伴侣的健康行为干预对拉丁裔夫妇产后二元满意度的影响。
Fam Process. 2018 Sep;57(3):629-648. doi: 10.1111/famp.12354. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Profiles of Low-Income Help-Seeking Couples and Implications for Intervention Gains: A Couple-Centered Approach.低收入求助夫妇的特征及对干预效果的启示:以夫妇为中心的方法。
Behav Ther. 2024 May;55(3):443-456. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Effects of relationship education on couple communication and satisfaction: A randomized controlled trial with low-income couples.关系教育对夫妻沟通与满意度的影响:一项针对低收入夫妻的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Feb;84(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000056. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Effectiveness of the 'Hold me Tight' Relationship Enhancement Program in a Self-referred and a Clinician-referred Sample: An Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy-Based Approach.“抱紧我”关系强化方案对自我推荐和临床推荐样本的有效性:一种基于情绪聚焦夫妻治疗的方法。
Fam Process. 2018 Sep;57(3):613-628. doi: 10.1111/famp.12305. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
A randomized waitlist-controlled trial of culturally sensitive relationship education for male same-sex couples.一项针对男同性恋伴侣的文化敏感型关系教育的随机候补名单对照试验。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Sep;30(6):763-8. doi: 10.1037/fam0000199. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Mechanisms of change in a brief, online relationship intervention.简短在线关系干预中改变的机制。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):57-67. doi: 10.1037/fam0000569. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Intimacy after prostate cancer: A brief couples' workshop is associated with improvements in relationship satisfaction.前列腺癌后的亲密关系:一场简短的夫妻工作坊与关系满意度的提高有关。
Psychooncology. 2017 Sep;26(9):1336-1346. doi: 10.1002/pon.4147. Epub 2016 May 16.
10
Consensus and relationship distress before and after a brief couples' intervention.夫妻简短干预前后的共识和关系困扰。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):128-134. doi: 10.1037/fam0000577. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Many distressed couples seek community-based relationship education but don't benefit from it.许多陷入困境的夫妻寻求基于社区的关系教育,但并未从中受益。
Fam Relat. 2024 Oct;73(4):2510-2526. doi: 10.1111/fare.13015. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Randomized controlled trial of the Marriage Checkup: Stress outcomes.《婚姻检查》随机对照试验:压力结果。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2023 Jan;49(1):242-259. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12620. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Helping couples achieve relationship success: A decade of progress in couple relationship education research and practice, 2010-2019.
帮助夫妻实现关系成功:2010-2019 年夫妻关系教育研究与实践的十年进展。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Jan;48(1):251-282. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12565. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Can Interventions that Strengthen Couples' Relationships Confer Additional Benefits for their Health? A Randomized Controlled Trial with African American Couples.干预措施能否增强夫妻关系,为其健康带来额外益处?一项针对非裔美国夫妇的随机对照试验。
Prev Sci. 2021 Apr;22(3):386-396. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01175-7. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
5
Couple relationship education program "Living as Partners": evaluation of effects on marital quality and conflict.夫妻关系教育项目“携手生活”:对婚姻质量和冲突影响的评估
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2018 Oct 3;31(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41155-018-0106-z.
6
Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.聚焦于夫妻的干预措施对局限性前列腺癌男性及其配偶的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):396-418. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
7
Maintenance of Gains in Relationship and Individual Functioning Following the Online OurRelationship Program.线上“我们的关系”项目后,在人际关系和个体功能方面维持收益。
Behav Ther. 2019 Jan;50(1):73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
8
Motivational interviewing with couples: A theoretical framework for clinical practice illustrated in substance use and HIV prevention intervention with gay male couples.夫妻动机性访谈:临床实践的理论框架,以男同性恋伴侣的物质使用和艾滋病毒预防干预为例说明
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2018 Dec;5(4):490-502. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000297. Epub 2018 Jun 25.