Mafigiri Richardson, Matovu Joseph K B, Makumbi Fredrick Edward, Ndyanabo Anthony, Nabukalu Doreen, Sakor Moses, Kigozi Godfrey, Nalugoda Fred, Wanyenze Rhoda K
Public Health Fellowship Program (PHFP) - Field Epidemiology Track, Ministry of Health-Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4166-2.
Although fishing communities have a significantly higher HIV prevalence than the general population, there is paucity of data on the burden of HIV and service utilization, particularly among the youth. We assessed the HIV prevalence and utilization of HIV prevention and treatment services among youth in Kasensero fishing community and the neighboring communities.
Data were derived from the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS) surveys conducted between 2013 and 2014. The RCCS is a population-based household survey that collects data annually from individuals aged 15-49 years, resident in 48 communities in Rakai and neighboring districts in Uganda. For this analysis, socio-demographic, behavioral and HIV-related data were obtained for 792 individuals aged 15-24 years. We used logistic regression to conduct bivariate and multivariable analysis to determine the factors that are independently associated with HIV-positive status and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Data were analyzed using STATA version 13.
Overall HIV prevalence was 19.7% (n = 155); higher in Kasensero (n = 141; 25.1%) and Gwanda (n = 8; 11%) than in Kyebe (n = 6; 3.9%), p < 0.001 and among females (n = 112; 26.0%) than males (n = 43; 12.0%), p < 0.001. Uptake of HIV testing was high in both HIV-positive (n = 136; 89.5%) and HIV-negative youth (n = 435; 92%). Consistent condom use was virtually non-existent in HIV-positive youth (n = 1; 0.6%) compared to HIV-negative youth (n = 20; 4.2%). Only 22.4% (n = 34) of the HIV-positive youth were receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 2013-2014; higher in the HIV-positive females (n = 31; 28.4%) than HIV-positive males (n = 03; 6.7%). Slightly more than half of males (n = 134; 53.8%) reported that they were circumcised; the proportion of circumcised youth was higher among HIV-negative males (n = 122; 58%) than HIV-positive males (n = 12; 27.9%). Factors significantly associated with HIV-positive status included living in Kasensero landing site (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 5.0; 95%CI: 2.22-13.01) and reporting one (aOR = 5.0; 95%CI: 1.33-15.80) or 2+ sexual partners in the past 12 months (aOR = 11.0; 95% CI; 3.04-36.72).
The prevalence of HIV is high especially among young females and in landing site communities than in the peripheral communities. Uptake of HIV prevention and treatment services is very low. There is an urgent need for youth-friendly services in these communities.
尽管渔业社区的艾滋病毒流行率显著高于普通人群,但关于艾滋病毒负担和服务利用情况的数据匮乏,尤其是在青年人群中。我们评估了卡森塞罗渔业社区及周边社区青年的艾滋病毒流行率以及艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务的利用情况。
数据来源于2013年至2014年进行的拉凯社区队列研究(RCCS)调查。RCCS是一项基于人群的家庭调查,每年从乌干达拉凯及周边地区48个社区中15至49岁的居民收集数据。对于本分析,获取了792名15至24岁个体的社会人口学、行为学及艾滋病毒相关数据。我们使用逻辑回归进行双变量和多变量分析,以确定与艾滋病毒阳性状态独立相关的因素及其相应的95%置信区间。使用STATA 13版软件进行数据分析。
总体艾滋病毒流行率为19.7%(n = 155);卡森塞罗(n = 141;25.1%)和关达(n = 8;11%)高于凯贝(n = 6;3.9%),p < 0.001,女性(n = 112;26.0%)高于男性(n = 43;12.0%),p < 0.001。艾滋病毒检测在艾滋病毒阳性青年(n = 136;89.5%)和艾滋病毒阴性青年(n = 435;92%)中接受率都很高。与艾滋病毒阴性青年(n = 20;4.2%)相比,艾滋病毒阳性青年(n = 1;0.6%)几乎不存在持续使用避孕套的情况。在2013 - 2014年,只有22.4%(n = 34)的艾滋病毒阳性青年接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART);艾滋病毒阳性女性(n = 31;28.4%)高于艾滋病毒阳性男性(n = 3;6.7%)。略多于一半的男性(n = 134;53.8%)报告他们接受了包皮环切术;艾滋病毒阴性男性(n = 122;58%)中接受包皮环切术的青年比例高于艾滋病毒阳性男性(n = 12;27.9%)。与艾滋病毒阳性状态显著相关的因素包括居住在卡森塞罗登陆点(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 5.0;95%置信区间:2.22 - 13.01)以及报告在过去12个月中有一个(aOR = 5.0;95%置信区间:1.33 - 15.80)或两个及以上性伴侣(aOR = 11.0;95%置信区间;3.04 - 36.72)。
艾滋病毒流行率很高,尤其是在年轻女性以及登陆点社区中高于周边社区。艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务的利用率非常低。这些社区迫切需要适合青年的服务。