Hansen Richard A, Williamson Margaret, Stevenson Lynn, Davis Brandy R, Evans R Lee
Auburn University, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, Alabama.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Feb 25;81(1):9. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8119.
To launch and evaluate a comparative effectiveness research education and dissemination program as part of an introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE). First- through third-year PharmD students received training on comparative effectiveness research and disseminated printed educational materials to patients in the community who they were monitoring longitudinally (n=314). Students completed an assessment and initial visit documentation form at the first visit, and a follow-up assessment and documentation form at a subsequent visit. Twenty-three diabetes patients, 29 acid-reflux patients, 30 osteoarthritis patients, and 50 hypertension patients received materials. Aside from the patient asking questions, which was the most common outcome (n=44), the program resulted in 38 additional actions, which included stopping, starting, or changing treatments or health behaviors, or having additional follow-up or diagnostic testing. Small but positive improvements in patient understanding, confidence, and self-efficacy were observed. Dissemination of comparative effectiveness research materials in an IPPE program demonstrated a positive trend in markers of informed decision-making.
开展并评估一项比较效果研究教育与传播项目,作为药学实践入门经验(IPPE)的一部分。一年级至三年级的药学博士学生接受了比较效果研究方面的培训,并向他们纵向监测的社区患者(n = 314)发放了印刷版教育材料。学生在首次就诊时填写一份评估和初次就诊记录表格,并在后续就诊时填写一份随访评估和记录表格。23名糖尿病患者、29名胃酸反流患者、30名骨关节炎患者和50名高血压患者收到了材料。除了患者提问这一最常见的结果(n = 44)外,该项目还带来了38项额外行动,包括停止、开始或改变治疗或健康行为,或进行额外的随访或诊断检测。观察到患者在理解、信心和自我效能方面有虽小但积极的改善。在IPPE项目中传播比较效果研究材料在知情决策指标方面呈现出积极趋势。