• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的健康保险计划选择:年轻健康人群更青睐限制性健康计划。

Health plan choice in the Netherlands: restrictive health plans preferred by young and healthy individuals.

作者信息

Bes Romy E, Curfs Emile C, Groenewegen Peter P, de Jong Judith D

机构信息

1Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118-124,3513 CR,Utrecht,The Netherlands.

2Open University,Valkenburgerweg 177,6419 AT,Heerlen,The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2017 Jul;12(3):345-362. doi: 10.1017/S1744133116000517. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133116000517
PMID:28290918
Abstract

In a health care system based on managed competition, health insurers negotiate on quality and price with care providers and are allowed to offer restrictive health plans. It is crucial that enrolees who need care choose restrictive health plans, as otherwise health insurers cannot channel patients to contracted providers and they will lose their bargaining power in negotiations with providers. We aim to explain enrolees' choice of a restrictive health plan in exchange for a lower premium. In 2014 an online survey with an experimental design was conducted on members of an access panel (response 78%; n=3,417). Results showed 37.4% of respondents willing to choose a restrictive health plan in exchange for a lower premium. This fell to 22% when the restrictive health plan also included a longer travelling time. Enrolees who choose a restrictive health plan are younger and healthier, or on lower incomes, than those preferring a non-restrictive one. This means that enrolees who use care will be unlikely to choose a restrictive health plan and, therefore, health insurers will not be able to channel them to contracted care providers. This undermines the goals of the health care system based on managed competition.

摘要

在基于管理式竞争的医疗保健系统中,健康保险公司与医疗服务提供者就质量和价格进行谈判,并被允许提供限制性健康计划。关键在于,需要医疗服务的参保人选择限制性健康计划,否则健康保险公司无法将患者引导至签约的医疗服务提供者处,并且会在与医疗服务提供者的谈判中失去议价能力。我们旨在解释参保人选择限制性健康计划以换取较低保费的原因。2014年,针对一个访问小组的成员进行了一项具有实验设计的在线调查(回复率78%;n = 3417)。结果显示,37.4%的受访者愿意选择限制性健康计划以换取较低保费。当限制性健康计划还包括更长的出行时间时,这一比例降至22%。选择限制性健康计划的参保人比那些倾向于非限制性健康计划的参保人更年轻、更健康或收入更低。这意味着使用医疗服务的参保人不太可能选择限制性健康计划,因此,健康保险公司将无法将他们引导至签约的医疗服务提供者处。这破坏了基于管理式竞争的医疗保健系统的目标。

相似文献

1
Health plan choice in the Netherlands: restrictive health plans preferred by young and healthy individuals.荷兰的健康保险计划选择:年轻健康人群更青睐限制性健康计划。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2017 Jul;12(3):345-362. doi: 10.1017/S1744133116000517. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
2
What health plans do people prefer? The trade-off between premium and provider choice.人们更喜欢哪些健康保险计划?保费与医疗机构选择之间的权衡。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Advice from the health insurer as a channelling strategy: a natural experiment at a Dutch health insurance company.健康保险公司作为一种引导策略的建议:荷兰一家健康保险公司的自然实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3624-6.
4
Selective contracting and channelling patients to preferred providers: A scoping review.选择性签约以及将患者引导至首选医疗机构:一项范围综述。
Health Policy. 2017 May;121(5):504-514. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
5
To what degree are health insurance enrollees in the Netherlands aware of the restrictive conditions attached to their policies?荷兰的医疗保险参保人对其保险政策所附加的限制条件了解程度如何?
Health Policy. 2022 Jul;126(7):693-703. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 16.
6
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
7
Role of health insurance in financing vaccinations for children and adolescents in the United States.医疗保险在美国为儿童和青少年接种疫苗提供资金的作用。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 5:S522-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1542L.
8
Pricing behaviour of nonprofit insurers in a weakly competitive social health insurance market.非营利保险公司在弱竞争社会医疗保险市场中的定价行为。
J Health Econ. 2011 Mar;30(2):439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
9
What can Europe learn from the managed care backlash in the United States?欧洲能从美国管理式医疗的强烈抵制中学到什么?
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
Eliciting preferences for social health insurance in Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.了解埃塞俄比亚社会医疗保险的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Dec;31(10):1423-1432. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw084. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Doctors as Resource Stewards? Translating High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care to the Consulting Room.医生作为资源管理者?将高价值、成本意识的护理转化到会诊室中。
Health Care Anal. 2022 Dec;30(3-4):215-239. doi: 10.1007/s10728-022-00446-4. Epub 2022 May 13.
2
Selection Incentives for Health Insurers in the Presence of Sophisticated Risk Adjustment.存在复杂风险调整时,对健康保险公司的选择激励。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Dec;77(6):584-595. doi: 10.1177/1077558719825982. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Advice from the health insurer as a channelling strategy: a natural experiment at a Dutch health insurance company.
健康保险公司作为一种引导策略的建议:荷兰一家健康保险公司的自然实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3624-6.