Sun Shu-Fen, Hsu Chien-Wei, Lin Huey-Shyan, Liou I-Hsiu, Chen Yin-Han, Hung Chia-Ling
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (S.-F.S., I-H.L., Y.-H.C., and C.-L.H.) and Department of Internal Medicine (C.-W.H.), Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan 2National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan 3School of Nursing, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Mar 15;99(6):462-471. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00469.
Viscosupplementation has been widely used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Because we found no well-controlled trial comparing single-injection regimens of hyaluronan for knee osteoarthritis, we compared the efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of a novel cross-linked hyaluronan (HYA-JOINT Plus) with a single injection of Synvisc-One in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial with a 6-month follow-up, 132 patients with knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3) were randomized to receive 1 intra-articular injection of 3 mL of HYA-JOINT Plus (20 mg/mL) (n = 66) or 6 mL of Synvisc-One (8 mg/mL) (n = 66). The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the visual analog scale (VAS) (0 to 100 mm) pain score at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC, Likert scale), Lequesne index, timed "Up & Go" (TUG) test, single-limb stance (SLS) test, use of rescue analgesics, and patient satisfaction.
A total of 121 patients were available for the intention-to-treat analysis at 6 months. Both groups had a significant improvement in the VAS, WOMAC, and Lequesne index scores at each follow-up visit (p < 0.001). Patients who received HYA-JOINT Plus experienced a significantly greater improvement in the VAS pain score at 1, 3, and 6 months compared with those treated with Synvisc-One (adjusted mean difference: -12.0, -8.5, and -6.6; p = 0.001, 0.033, and 0.045, respectively). There were no significant between-group differences in any of the secondary outcomes except the WOMAC stiffness scores at 6 months, which favored HYA-JOINT Plus treatment (p = 0.043). The TUG time did not change significantly in either group during the study (p > 0.05), but the SLS time improved significantly in both the HYA-JOINT Plus and the Synvisc-One group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.022, respectively). No significant between-group differences were observed with respect to patient satisfaction or consumption of analgesics. No serious adverse events occurred following the injections.
A single injection of either HYA-JOINT Plus or Synvisc-One is safe and effective for 6 months in patients with knee osteoarthritis. HYA-JOINT Plus is superior to Synvisc-One in terms of reducing the VAS pain score at 1, 3, and 6 months and the WOMAC stiffness score at 6 months, with similar safety.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
关节腔内注射透明质酸已广泛用于治疗膝关节骨关节炎。由于我们未找到比较透明质酸单次注射方案治疗膝关节骨关节炎的严格对照试验,因此我们比较了新型交联透明质酸(HYA-JOINT Plus)单次关节腔内注射与单次注射施沛特(Synvisc-One)治疗膝关节骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。
在一项前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验中,对132例膝关节骨关节炎(Kellgren-Lawrence分级为2级或3级)患者进行为期6个月的随访,将其随机分为两组,分别接受1次关节腔内注射3 mL HYA-JOINT Plus(20 mg/mL)(n = 66)或6 mL施沛特(Synvisc-One)(8 mg/mL)(n = 66)。主要结局指标为6个月时视觉模拟量表(VAS)(0至100 mm)疼痛评分相对于基线的变化。次要结局指标包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC,Likert量表)、Lequesne指数、计时“起立-行走”(TUG)试验、单腿站立(SLS)试验、急救镇痛药的使用情况以及患者满意度。
共有121例患者可纳入6个月时的意向性分析。两组在每次随访时VAS、WOMAC和Lequesne指数评分均有显著改善(p < 0.001)。与接受施沛特治疗的患者相比,接受HYA-JOINT Plus治疗的患者在1个月、3个月和6个月时VAS疼痛评分改善更为显著(调整后平均差值分别为:-12.0、-8.5和-6.6;p分别为0.001、0.033和0.045)。除6个月时WOMAC僵硬评分有利于HYA-JOINT Plus治疗外(p = 0.043),两组在任何次要结局指标上均无显著组间差异。研究期间两组TUG时间均无显著变化(p > 0.05),但HYA-JOINT Plus组和施沛特组的SLS时间均显著改善(分别为p = 0.004和p = 0.022)。在患者满意度或镇痛药使用方面未观察到显著组间差异。注射后未发生严重不良事件。
单次注射HYA-JOINT Plus或施沛特对膝关节骨关节炎患者在6个月内安全有效。在降低1个月、3个月和6个月时的VAS疼痛评分以及6个月时的WOMAC僵硬评分方面,HYA-JOINT Plus优于施沛特,且安全性相似。
治疗性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。