Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Norrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jun;69(6):1097-102. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.118042. Epub 2010 May 6.
To examine the long-term efficacy and safety of five intra-articular injections with hyaluronan in knee osteoarthritis.
A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled double-blind study of 337 patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for knee osteoarthritis (clinical and laboratory) and with a Lequesne algofunctional index score (LFI) of 10 or greater. Patients received a hyaluronan product (sodium hyaluronate; Hyalgan) (n=167) or saline (n=170) intra-articularly weekly for 5 weeks and were followed up to 1 year. Time to recurrence was the primary efficacy parameter. LFI, pain on walking 50 m based on visual analogue scale (VAS pain 50 m), paracetamol consumption, patients' global assessment, Nottingham health profile, joint effusion and number of responders were secondary efficacy parameters. The efficacy parameters were analysed by intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP). All adverse events (AE) were recorded as safety parameters.
Time to recurrence showed no significant treatment effect (ITT analysis, p=0.26). Change from baseline in LFI and VAS pain 50 m for the ITT population showed no treatment effect. Paracetamol consumption, patients' global assessment, responder rates and AE displayed no significant difference between treatment groups, analysed by both ITT and PP. Treatment compliance was 95% in the hyaluronan group and 99% in the placebo group. No safety problems were registered.
In patients fulfilling the ACR criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee with moderate to severe disease activity (LFI > or = 10), five intra-articular injections of hyaluronan did not improve pain, function, paracetamol consumption or other efficacy parameters 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the treatment.
评估五次膝关节内注射透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎的长期疗效和安全性。
一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究纳入了 337 例符合美国风湿病学会(ACR)膝骨关节炎(临床和实验室)标准且 Lequesne 功能指数评分(LFI)≥10 的患者。患者接受透明质酸钠(Hyalgan)(n=167)或生理盐水(n=170)每周一次关节内注射,共 5 周,并随访 1 年。复发时间是主要疗效参数。LFI、基于视觉模拟量表的 50 米步行疼痛(VAS 疼痛 50 m)、扑热息痛消耗量、患者整体评估、诺丁汉健康调查问卷、关节积液和应答者数量是次要疗效参数。采用意向治疗(ITT)和方案(PP)分析疗效参数。所有不良事件(AE)均作为安全性参数记录。
复发时间无显著治疗效果(ITT 分析,p=0.26)。ITT 人群的 LFI 和 VAS 疼痛 50 m 的基线变化无治疗效果。扑热息痛消耗量、患者整体评估、应答率和 AE 在 ITT 和 PP 分析中,两组间无显著差异。透明质酸组的治疗依从性为 95%,安慰剂组为 99%。未发现安全性问题。
在符合美国风湿病学会膝骨关节炎标准且疾病活动度中度至重度(LFI≥10)的患者中,五次膝关节内注射透明质酸在治疗后 3、6、9 和 12 个月时不能改善疼痛、功能、扑热息痛消耗量或其他疗效参数。