Egorov V V, Savchenko N V, Sorokin E L, Danilov O V
Khabarovsk branch of the Academician S.N. Fyodorov IRTC 'Eye Microsurgery', 211 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, Russian Federation, 680033; Postgraduate Institute for Public Health Workers, 9 Krasnodarskaya St., Khabarovsk, Russian Federation, 680009.
Khabarovsk branch of the Academician S.N. Fyodorov IRTC 'Eye Microsurgery', 211 Tikhookeanskaya St., Khabarovsk, Russian Federation, 680033.
Vestn Oftalmol. 2017;133(1):19-26. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2017133119-26.
to study the frequency of misdiagnosis of cataract in patients with optic nerve pathology or amblyopia and to identify its main causes.
The study enrolled 381 patients (381 eyes) wrongly diagnosed with cataract. A standard set of eye tests was performed. In-depth examination of the macular area was done through biomicroscopy with contactless aspheric lenses of 60 and 90 D. Part of the patients underwent optical coherence tomography and static perimetry as well as examination of electrical sensitivity threshold and electrical lability of the optic nerve.
In 190 patients (190 eyes - 49.9%), the true cause of central vision impairment was optic nerve pathology associated with its partial atrophy of different origins: vascular (77.8%) or post-traumatic (22.2%). Glaucomatous atrophy of the optic nerve was found in 175 patients within the age range from 57 to 70 years (175 eyes - 45.9%). These were newly diagnosed cases of advanced open-angle glaucoma. In 16 eyes (4.2%), the true cause of low vision appeared to be amblyopia of some type: strabismic (9 eyes - 56.3%), refractive (4 eyes - 25%), or mixed (3 eyes - 18.7%).
The main diagnostic errors of attending ophthalmologists were the following: underestimation of the discrepancy between low visual functions and small degree of lens opacity as well as the neglect of careful examination of the fundus (specifically, the optic disc and macula), additional perimetry, thorough history taking, and cover-testing for suspected amblyopia.
研究视神经病变或弱视患者中白内障的误诊频率,并确定其主要原因。
该研究纳入了381例被误诊为白内障的患者(381只眼)。进行了一套标准的眼部检查。通过使用60D和90D非接触式非球面镜片的生物显微镜对黄斑区进行了深入检查。部分患者接受了光学相干断层扫描和静态视野检查,以及视神经电敏感度阈值和电兴奋性检查。
在190例患者(190只眼 - 49.9%)中,中心视力损害的真正原因是视神经病变,伴有不同起源的部分萎缩:血管性(77.8%)或创伤后(22.2%)。在年龄范围为57至70岁的175例患者中发现了青光眼性视神经萎缩(175只眼 - 45.9%)。这些是新诊断的晚期开角型青光眼病例。在16只眼(4.2%)中,低视力的真正原因似乎是某种类型的弱视:斜视性(9只眼 - 56.3%)、屈光不正性(4只眼 - 25%)或混合性(3只眼 - 18.7%)。
主治眼科医生的主要诊断错误如下:低估低视力功能与晶状体混浊程度较轻之间的差异,以及忽视对眼底(特别是视盘和黄斑)的仔细检查、额外的视野检查、全面的病史采集以及对疑似弱视的遮盖试验。